On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Thanks Keith. I've verified the fix on ppc, sparc & mips. Please go ahead with
> a release.
Done.
http://kr.github.com/beanstalkd/2012/09/11/1.7-release-notes.html
Thanks for all the help with this, and for your patience. :)
--
To
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 666775 pending
Bug #666775 [beanstalkd] beanstalkd 1.5 tests are flaky in certain arches
(FTBFS)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
666775: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
tag 666775 pending
thanks
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:22:45AM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
> Ok, I believe this is fixed now in
[..]
> If this looks good, I'm set to make a release.
Thanks Keith. I've verified the fix on ppc, sparc & mips. Please go ahead with
a release.
--
Every great idea is wor
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Going back to the subject of the bug report, please let me know when you have
> a potential fix for the failing tests, and I'll test it on whatever arches you
> don't have access to.
Ok, I believe this is fixed now in
https://github.com
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Going back to the subject of the bug report, please let me know when you have
> a potential fix for the failing tests, and I'll test it on whatever arches you
> don't have access to.
Will do.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-r
[adding back bug report in CC]
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 02:31:47PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > I'm happy to keep 1.4 if you as upstream commit to support it for serious
> > bug
> > and security issues for another 3+ years.
>
> I'm h
Hi Keith,
Thanks for the prompt response.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:09:09PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > Since I haven't heard from you on a fix for 1.6, 1.5 tests never ran
> > successfully, and I do not wish to keep 1.4 in the nex
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Since I haven't heard from you on a fix for 1.6, 1.5 tests never ran
> successfully, and I do not wish to keep 1.4 in the next Debian stable release,
> I'm going to request the removal of beanstalkd from the Debian archive.
>
> Even if y
Hi Keith,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:45:14AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:34:48AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:08:38PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas
> > > wr
Hi Keith,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:34:48AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:08:38PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas
> > wrote:
> > > I've uploaded 1.6 but many tests fail with a timeout in powerpc & s390(x)
> >
>
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:08:38PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > I've uploaded 1.6 but many tests fail with a timeout in powerpc & s390(x)
>
> Looks like it fails on all the big-endian architectures.
> Debugging this would be much eas
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> I've uploaded 1.6 but many tests fail with a timeout in powerpc & s390(x)
Looks like it fails on all the big-endian architectures.
Debugging this would be much easier if I had access
to a big-endian machine. I'll work on it.
--
To
Hi Keith,
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:36:32AM +, Keith Rarick wrote [edited]:
[..]
> I'll make another release as soon as I can fix
> https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/issues/114
I've uploaded 1.6 but many tests fail with a timeout in powerpc & s390(x), as
of now at least. For the full list of
Awesome, thanks!
I made sure to keep all the existing tests that weren't
redundant or otherwise nonsensical. The binlog sizelimit
test is now a function in integ-test.c.
I'll make another release as soon as I can fix
https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/issues/114
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
hi keith,
"make check" from latest git passes on x86_64 running Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64; I
ran it half a dozen times, since we're dealing with a race condition (but you
never know obviously)
with the whole reorg of tests, I'm not even sure though which tests are still
in place (fwiw the one failing
15 matches
Mail list logo
