Tesseract uploading now. We'll see how this goes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Leptonica upload commencing now. Tesseract coming.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi again,
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Yes, I can sponsor.
Thanks. The release team has given the green light:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=30;bug=680674
So I would like to propose
http://alioth.debian.org/~jrnieder-guest/temp/leptonlib-transition/leptonlib_1.69-3.1.dsc
Yes, I can sponsor. My goal is to not get in the way of your energy,
but also be careful to keep the level of chaos under control. The
inclusion of Leptonica and Tesseract must not be jeopardized.
Jakub, you are welcome to weigh in on this bug if you wish.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bug
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> I am also okay with you doing an NMU on Leptonica/Tesseract.
Thanks. Let's see whether the release team approves the transition.
I am not a DD. Would you be interested in sponsoring uploads fixing
this if I prepare source packages once the release team has weighed
in?
I am also okay with you doing an NMU on Leptonica/Tesseract.
Note that Jakub Wilk was fantastically helpful during the great
Tesseract renaming a few months ago, although I probably
drove him crazy in the process.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> In retrospect, it was possibly a mistake for upstream to bump
> the soname up to 3 in one of the releases. It is also very
> hard for me to imagine any scenario where having multiple
> versions of Leptonica installed at the same time makes sense.
Here's a patch on top of
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> I've been dragging my feet on this bug because I didn't see
> any harm for users in the current situation.
If you decide not to fix the package name, then libleptonica needs to
at least have a Breaks against leptonica-progs and tesseract-ocr from
squeeze. And likewise e
Just for background information, Leptonica has a big hulking
API, something on the order of a thousand calls. Upstream
is constantly making tweaks around the periphery, often just
adding more stuff.
In retrospect, it was possibly a mistake for upstream to bump
the soname up to 3 in one of the rele
tags 664176 + patch
quit
Hi!
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> This report is valid. Having gone through a package rename with
> Tesseract, I am a little bit scared to tackle this
This particular rename doesn't seem so bad. How about this patch?
If it looks good, please coordinate with the release te
This report is valid. Having gone through a package rename with
Tesseract, I am a little bit scared to tackle this - it took me a half
dozen attempts to get it right.
Fortunately, users are not be suffering - bug #664175 was
addressed through another mechanism.
Bottom line, it may take some tim
Package: libleptonica
Version: 1.69-2
Severity: serious
Justification: policy ยง8.1
Policy sayeth:
The run-time shared library must be placed in a package whose
name changes whenever the SONAME of the shared library changes.
But libleptonica in squeeze and wheezy have the same nam
12 matches
Mail list logo
