Bug#658326: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#658326: marked as done (bacula: sha implimentation is non-free)

2012-06-18 Thread Karl Goetz
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012, 06:38:32 EST, Luca Capello wrote: posting mobile, hopefully i didnt trim anything vital out. > On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:06:52 +0200, Karl Goetz wrote: > > On Wed, 02 May 2012 15:16:36 +0200 > > Luca Capello wrote: > fixed in squeeze-proposed-updates with the packages at: > =

Processed: Re: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#658326: marked as done (bacula: sha implimentation is non-free)

2012-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 658326 5.0.2-2.2 Bug #658326 {Done: Luca Capello } [bacula] bacula: sha implimentation is non-free Marked as found in versions bacula/5.0.2-2.2. > tags 658326 + squeeze Bug #658326 {Done: Luca Capello } [bacula] bacula: sha implimentation

Bug#658326: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#658326: marked as done (bacula: sha implimentation is non-free)

2012-06-15 Thread Luca Capello
found 658326 5.0.2-2.2 tags 658326 + squeeze found 658326 5.0.3-1 tags 658326 + sid thanks Hi there! On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:06:52 +0200, Karl Goetz wrote: > On Wed, 02 May 2012 15:16:36 +0200 > Luca Capello wrote: > > Sorry I missed this entire discussion; I forgot about the bug entirely > until

Bug#658326: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#658326: marked as done (bacula: sha implimentation is non-free)

2012-06-15 Thread Karl Goetz
On Wed, 02 May 2012 15:16:36 +0200 Luca Capello wrote: Sorry I missed this entire discussion; I forgot about the bug entirely until I saw the close email :/ > Hi there! > > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:21:51 +0200, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:17:34 +00

Bug#658326: marked as done (bacula: sha implimentation is non-free)

2012-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:17:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#658326: fixed in bacula 5.2.6+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #658326, regarding bacula: sha implimentation is non-free to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#658326: marked as done (bacula: sha implimentation is non-free)

2012-05-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 658326 Bug #658326 {Done: Kefu Chai } [bacula] bacula: sha implimentation is non-free Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #658326 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contac

Processed: Re: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#658326: marked as done (bacula: sha implimentation is non-free)

2012-05-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 658326 + upstream Bug #658326 {Done: Kefu Chai } [bacula] bacula: sha implimentation is non-free Added tag(s) upstream. > notfixed 658326 5.0.3+dfsg-0.1 Bug #658326 {Done: Kefu Chai } [bacula] bacula: sha implimentation is non-free No longe

Bug#658326: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#658326: marked as done (bacula: sha implimentation is non-free)

2012-05-02 Thread Luca Capello
tags 658326 + upstream notfixed 658326 5.0.3+dfsg-0.1 thanks Hi there! On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:21:51 +0200, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:17:34 + > with message-id > and subject line Bug#658326: fixed in bacula 5.0.3+dfsg-0.1 > has caused the Debia

Bug#658326: marked as done (bacula: sha implimentation is non-free)

2012-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:17:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#658326: fixed in bacula 5.0.3+dfsg-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #658326, regarding bacula: sha implimentation is non-free to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt