Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-04-15 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On dim., 2012-04-15 at 20:32 +0200, Carsten Hey wrote: > * Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-04-15 09:18 +0200]: > > On ven., 2012-03-23 at 23:39 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: […] Ok, I give up. -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-04-15 Thread Carsten Hey
* Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-04-15 09:18 +0200]: > On ven., 2012-03-23 at 23:39 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > > I think we should drop ftpmaster from CC in further mails. > > Maybe, since they don't seem to care about this. They provided an IMHO acceptable, but not ideal, way (because there there does

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-23 Thread Carsten Hey
* Carsten Hey [2012-03-23 23:39 +0100]: > Having an easy command to unpack and repack waf scripts > would have been great, but this is not possible unless we would adapt > the values of C1 and C2 in the waf script (and thus parsing python), > which would lead to an ugly hack. Alternatively, a temp

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-15 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On sam., 2012-03-10 at 20:24 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On sam., 2012-03-10 at 19:12 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > > * Carsten Hey [2012-03-10 18:43 +0100]: > > > * Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-03-10 16:30 +0100]: > > > > I have to admit I'm not exactly sure what your point is. From where does > >

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-10 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On sam., 2012-03-10 at 19:12 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > * Carsten Hey [2012-03-10 18:43 +0100]: > > * Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-03-10 16:30 +0100]: > > > I have to admit I'm not exactly sure what your point is. From where does > > > the waf command you're using come from? > > > > ... > > Actually I

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-10 Thread Carsten Hey
* Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-03-10 16:30 +0100]: > On ven., 2012-03-09 at 21:42 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > > [ I'm sending this to the two bugs Rhonda sent the mail I reply to and > > an additional bug tagged wontfix to avoid spamming all affected bugs ] > > Can't this be helpful to others? If any

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-10 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On ven., 2012-03-09 at 21:42 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > [ I'm sending this to the two bugs Rhonda sent the mail I reply to and > an additional bug tagged wontfix to avoid spamming all affected bugs ] Can't this be helpful to others? > > * Gerfried Fuchs [2011-10-13 15:12 +0200]: > > it seems