# hard to reproduce, doesn't seem to be a security hole (?)
severity 628917 important
quit
Michal Suchanek wrote:
> I guess this issue was related to accessing the desktop with x11vnc
> somehow.
>
> I upgraded xscreensaver and also avoided weird access patterns with
> x11vnc and did not observe t
hello,
Excerpts from Jonathan Nieder's message of Mon Jan 09 01:09:49 +0100 2012:
> Hi,
>
> Jose Luis Rivas wrote:
>
> > Both bugs are reported against 5.11 for testing, while 5.11 was outdated
> > for testing, it was supposed the submitter was upgrading to 5.14-1 but
> > never got responses, af
Hi,
Jose Luis Rivas wrote:
> Both bugs are reported against 5.11 for testing, while 5.11 was outdated
> for testing, it was supposed the submitter was upgrading to 5.14-1 but
> never got responses, affirmative nor negative.
>
> If any of these is still valid, please feel free to re-open.
It help
Hi,
So, you upgraded to 5.14 and?
It keeps giving this? It changed? What?
--
Jose Luis Rivas - GPG (old/new): 0xCACAB118 / 0x7C4DF50D
San Cristóbal, Venezuela - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/
Debian Project Developer - http://debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: xscreensaver
Version: 5.11-1+b1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
I guess I am experiencing the bug just fixed in unstable on Squeeze:
I have this in my .xsession-errors:
xscreensaver-command: activating and locking.
xscreensaver-command: activating and
5 matches
Mail list logo
