Hi,
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> > Anyway, is there any news on the NMU? Please note that the bug
> > makes many of the binary packages built from this version of
> > pulseaudio, uninstallable, as reported by #629394.
>
> As the package is currently in expe
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply.
> Arnaud, I think libxcb-atom1-dev would be better replaced by
> libxcb-util0-dev, which completely replaces libxcb-atom1-dev,
> instead of libxcb1-dev
No, because the only reason why pulseaudio was depending on libxcb-atom1
was xcb_atom_get
tags 624847 + pending
thanks
Thanks, guys. I've committed this to git master.
Cheers,
-Dan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arnaud,
I think libxcb-atom1-dev would be better replaced by libxcb-util0-dev,
which completely replaces libxcb-atom1-dev, instead of libxcb1-dev, am I
wrong?
Anyway, is there any news on the NMU? Please note that the bug makes many
of the binary packages built from this version of pulseaudio,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 624847 + sid wheezy
Bug #624847 [src:pulseaudio] pulseaudio does not build anymore with xcb-util
0.3.8
Added tag(s) sid and wheezy.
> severity 624847 serious
Bug #624847 [src:pulseaudio] pulseaudio does not build anymore with xcb-util
0.3.8
5 matches
Mail list logo