Bug#611657: executable name is confusing, software already outdated

2011-11-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Jérémy Lal wrote: > It's been resolved before squeeze release, hence closing. Thanks for looking it over. One RC bug down, 2124 to go. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#611657: executable name is confusing, software already outdated

2011-11-28 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Jeremy Lal wrote: > Hence it is much more preferable to remove nodejs 0.2.0 from squeeze, instead > of having an unusable and confusing version. This report feels out-of-date. Is it still needed, or has it been resolved? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org wit

Bug#611657: executable name is confusing, software already outdated

2011-01-31 Thread Geza Kovacs
Explicit confirmation for the removal of nodejs and coffeescript from squeeze given. On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 19:23 +0100, Jeremy Lal wrote: >> nodejs version 0.2.0 has its executable renamed to /usr/bin/nodejs [1], >> and while it was all ri

Bug#611657: executable name is confusing, software already outdated

2011-01-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 19:23 +0100, Jeremy Lal wrote: > nodejs version 0.2.0 has its executable renamed to /usr/bin/nodejs [1], > and while it was all right for testing purposes, it is now not > acceptable : [...] > Hence it is much more preferable to remove nodejs 0.2.0 from squeeze, instead > of h

Bug#611657: executable name is confusing, software already outdated

2011-01-31 Thread Jeremy Lal
Package: nodejs Version: 0.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: squeeze nodejs version 0.2.0 has its executable renamed to /usr/bin/nodejs [1], and while it was all right for testing purposes, it is now not acceptable : * it will confuse users, and force them to add /usr/local/bin/node link * nodejs is