Hi,
> > There is absolutely *no* relation between unattended-upgrades and
> > pm-utils. Any process running at the time of hibernation could consider
> > itself just as important as unattended-upgrades, thereby preventing the
> I'm open for better suggestions but it seems preferable to delay
> h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian.org
Selected user id (release.debian.org) invalid, sorry
> usertag 610333 squeeze-can-defer
No valid user selected
> tag 610333 squeeze-ignore
Bug #610333 [unattended-upgrades] unattended-upgrades: delaying hibernation
until c
user release.debian.org
usertag 610333 squeeze-can-defer
tag 610333 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 18:30:38 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Package: unattended-upgrades
> Version: 0.62.2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
Severity is arguable, but in any
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 06:30:38PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Package: unattended-upgrades
> Version: 0.62.2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The hook /etc/pm/sleep.d/10_unattended-upgrades-hibernate deliberate
Package: unattended-upgrades
Version: 0.62.2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The hook /etc/pm/sleep.d/10_unattended-upgrades-hibernate deliberately breaks
pm-utils by preventing the system from hibernating while unattended-
5 matches
Mail list logo