On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 16:47:23 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> - if debconf is not installed at configuration time but is present
>at purge time
>
seems unlikely, with e.g.
Package: libpam-modules
Pre-Depends: debconf
Package: login
Essential: yes
Pre-Depends: libpam-modules
But ok. :)
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 14:36:05 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> diff -u runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.postrm runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.postrm
>> --- runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.postrm
>> +++ runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.postrm
>> @@ -9,13 +9,18 @@
[...]
>> +
>> +# remove lingering deb
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 14:36:05 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> diff -u runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.postrm runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.postrm
> --- runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.postrm
> +++ runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.postrm
> @@ -9,13 +9,18 @@
>sed -e '/#-- runit begin/,/#-- runit end/d' \
> /etc/in
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 22:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> I debated whether your second or third patch (i.e. trying to fix up the
>> debconf support, or removing it) was the way to go and would prefer to
>> simply revert the debconf use; if anyone sees any problems with
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 22:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Thanks for working on this. This patch looks good to me:
>
> On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 13:48 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > -- 8< --
> > Subject: remove vestiges of the runit-run package
[...]
> I debated whether your second or third patc
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for working on this. This patch looks good to me:
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 13:48 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> -- 8< --
> Subject: remove vestiges of the runit-run package
>
> Upgrades from lenny are failing because of a missing template
> from the runit-run package.
>
> Whi
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> possible fix for that. postrm is still a bit broken
> (it will print an error message if init is not running and does not
> respect the user choice expressed in runit/signalinit).
... part 3 is to remove support for the runit/signalinit choice in
squeeze, since (1) it wa
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> - if debconf is not installed and no init process is present,
>postinst fails;
> - there should be no debconf prompt at all, not a high priority one,
>when no init process is present (as you mentioned).
... and here is a possible fix for that. postrm is still a
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Thanks for looking at this bug. I think the patch you've suggested is
> the wrong solution, however.
>
> As runit-run no longer exists after lenny, I think removing the
> entire block of code would be a better solution.
I agree.
> In terms of the second part of the patc
# CC to debian-devel for squeeze blocker
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 605912 + squeeze-is-blocker
thanks
Hi,
Thanks for looking at this bug. I think the patch you've suggested is
the wrong solution, however.
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 01:14 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> I gue
tags 605912 patch
thanks
Hi,
I guess it is due to lack of flag in debconf templates file.
Here's a proposal patch, it works in my chroot environment.
diff -u runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.templates.in
runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.templates.in
--- runit-2.1.1/debian/runit.templates.in
+++ runit-2.1.1/
11 matches
Mail list logo
