On Wednesday 09 February 2011 01.12:57 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Of course, we can simply orphan Qt 3, and hope somebody will step up to
> maintain it; we are unconvinced this is a responsible step for us to take
> as it would place the maintenance burden of a large package on
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 08:42:38 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I comaintain upstream qucs a simulator of electronics circuit and the
> only free one able to simulate radio frequency circuit.
>
> In the scientific field a lot of software depend of qt3. And a lot of
> uptream lack ressource to port
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 12:42:38PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> In the scientific field a lot of software depend of qt3. And a lot of
Same for kpicosim, but I'm pretty confident that I can run qt3to4 on it
and simply link with qt4's qt3 support library.
Last time I tried, the whole process
I comaintain upstream qucs a simulator of electronics circuit and the
only free one able to simulate radio frequency circuit.
In the scientific field a lot of software depend of qt3. And a lot of
uptream lack ressource to port to qt4. At my workplace (university) we
are using a lot this kind of so
4 matches
Mail list logo
