On Thu, 30 Dec 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
dietlibc seems to be fixed now. Could you please test again and tell
us if this issue if fixed as well?
Yes, it is fixed in 0.30.216-pre2864-2+b2.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
Ivan Jager wrote:
> Ok, so I started looking at the internals of dietlibc, and I noticed
> the data returned by getdents64 looks as I would expect, but the
> struct dirent64 does not match it. Apparently the way these things
> are being compiled it ends up with sizeof(uint64_t) = 4, so the
> struc
Ok, so I started looking at the internals of dietlibc, and I noticed the
data returned by getdents64 looks as I would expect, but the struct
dirent64 does not match it. Apparently the way these things are being
compiled it ends up with sizeof(uint64_t) = 4, so the struct fields don't
line up.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, micah anderson wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:13:20 +0100 (CET), "Daniel Hokka Zakrisson"
wrote:
What dietlibc version was used to build the binaries? Does it have
http://people.linux-vserver.org/~dhozac/p/m/delta-dietdirent-fix01.diff
applied? IIRC this was one way that
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:13:20 +0100 (CET), "Daniel Hokka Zakrisson"
wrote:
> What dietlibc version was used to build the binaries? Does it have
> http://people.linux-vserver.org/~dhozac/p/m/delta-dietdirent-fix01.diff
> applied? IIRC this was one way that problem exhibited itself.
Actually, I li
micah anderson wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:13:20 +0100 (CET), "Daniel Hokka Zakrisson"
> wrote:
>
>> What dietlibc version was used to build the binaries? Does it have
>> http://people.linux-vserver.org/~dhozac/p/m/delta-dietdirent-fix01.diff
>> applied? IIRC this was one way that problem exh
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:13:20 +0100 (CET), "Daniel Hokka Zakrisson"
wrote:
> What dietlibc version was used to build the binaries? Does it have
> http://people.linux-vserver.org/~dhozac/p/m/delta-dietdirent-fix01.diff
> applied? IIRC this was one way that problem exhibited itself.
Looking at the
Ivan Jager wrote:
> Package: util-vserver
> Version: 0.30.216-pre2864-2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
>
> I'm trying to switch to vservers from openvz because openvz support (for
> sparc) got silently dropped in Lenny. After installing
> linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserve
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.216-pre2864-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I'm trying to switch to vservers from openvz because openvz support (for
sparc) got silently dropped in Lenny. After installing
linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-sparc64, during boot I get an
9 matches
Mail list logo
