On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 00:42 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 30/05/14 17:57, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > On 16:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> Just a reminder: there are still various things depending on the removed
> >> packages, preventing things from migrating to testing.
> >
On 15:16, Robert Millan wrote:
> Indeed. Unless something has changed, only broken (linux-)i386 dependencies
> prevent migration.
Um, a binary package on any release arch stalls migration, I think. Did
you say that based on the Britney excuses output as shown on the PTS?
Britney tests installabi
On 30/05/14 18:32, Jérôme Vouillon wrote:
Hi,
On 30/05/2014 17:57, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 16:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Just a reminder: there are still various things depending on the removed
packages, preventing things from migrating to testing.
Do you agree it's just the two
On 30/05/14 17:57, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> On 16:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Just a reminder: there are still various things depending on the removed
>> packages, preventing things from migrating to testing.
>
> Do you agree it's just the two metapackages from src:meta
Hi,
On 30/05/2014 17:57, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 16:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Just a reminder: there are still various things depending on the removed
>> packages, preventing things from migrating to testing.
>
> Do you agree it's just the two metapackages from src:meta-gnome3 t
Hi Emilio,
On 16:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Just a reminder: there are still various things depending on the removed
> packages, preventing things from migrating to testing.
Do you agree it's just the two metapackages from src:meta-gnome3 that
need changes, or is there anything else?
ht
On 11/05/14 23:01, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 11/05/14 21:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 17:37:29 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>>
>>> I've uploaded an NMU with the removal of "kfreebsd-any" (and "hurd-any"
>>> as per porter's request) from Architecture. A debdiff is attached.
>>
On 11/05/14 21:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 17:37:29 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
I've uploaded an NMU with the removal of "kfreebsd-any" (and "hurd-any"
as per porter's request) from Architecture. A debdiff is attached.
Do you plan on also handling the reverse dependencie
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 17:37:29 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> I've uploaded an NMU with the removal of "kfreebsd-any" (and "hurd-any"
> as per porter's request) from Architecture. A debdiff is attached.
>
Do you plan on also handling the reverse dependencies (with binary
removals and/or patches,
On 04/05/14 13:33, Robert Millan wrote:
Please could you remove "kfreebsd-any" from Architecture in gdm3 ?
You may close the following RC bugs when doing this:
#602724
#601106
#612157
#733546
A patch is attached for your convenience.
Hi,
I've uploaded an NMU with the removal of "kfreebsd-a
Please could you remove "kfreebsd-any" from Architecture in gdm3 ?
You may close the following RC bugs when doing this:
#602724
#601106
#612157
#733546
A patch is attached for your convenience.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
diff -ur gdm3-3.8.4.old/debian/control gdm3-3.8.4/debian/control
--- gdm3
11 matches
Mail list logo
