Bug#595594: (no subject)

2010-10-30 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Sun, October 10, 2010 16:57, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 00:54 +0200, J.M.Roth wrote: >> tags 595594 +pending >> thanks >> >> Ok, >> our own database functions now exit even more gracefully on failure. >> The previous fix (586759) seemed to address a similar issue but only >>

Bug#595594: (no subject)

2010-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 00:54 +0200, J.M.Roth wrote: > tags 595594 +pending > thanks > > Ok, > our own database functions now exit even more gracefully on failure. > The previous fix (586759) seemed to address a similar issue but only > when dbconfig itself was failing, not the DB behind. That was

Bug#595594: (no subject)

2010-09-11 Thread J.M.Roth
tags 595594 +pending thanks Ok, our own database functions now exit even more gracefully on failure. The previous fix (586759) seemed to address a similar issue but only when dbconfig itself was failing, not the DB behind. Greets, JM For reference, here's the link to the full discussion about