Bug#588055: regression of 572606

2010-07-05 Thread Simon Josefsson
LaMont Jones writes: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 05:05:10PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> retitle 588055 Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D >> >> The issue is identical to the issue in the last bug report? But right, >> I have retitled this bug report now so at least it has the same

Bug#588055: regression of 572606

2010-07-05 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 05:05:10PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > retitle 588055 Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D > > The issue is identical to the issue in the last bug report? But right, > I have retitled this bug report now so at least it has the same subject. In which case, reo

Processed: Re: Bug#588055: regression of 572606

2010-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 588055 Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D Bug #588055 [bind9] zkt rfcs/drafts found in orig.tar.gz Changed Bug title to 'Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D' from 'zkt rfcs/drafts found in orig.tar.gz' > thanks Stoppi

Bug#588055: regression of 572606

2010-07-05 Thread Simon Josefsson
retitle 588055 Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D thanks The issue is identical to the issue in the last bug report? But right, I have retitled this bug report now so at least it has the same subject. Thanks, /Simon LaMont Jones writes: > Good point. OTOH, an actual bit of content

Bug#588055: regression of 572606

2010-07-05 Thread LaMont Jones
Good point. OTOH, an actual bit of content in the bug would have helped simplify the work of understanding what your issue was. lamont On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 04:05:10PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Severity: serious > Package: bind9 > Version: 1:9.7.1.dfsg-1 > User: debian-rele...@lists.debi

Bug#588055: regression of 572606

2010-07-04 Thread Simon Josefsson
Severity: serious Package: bind9 Version: 1:9.7.1.dfsg-1 User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org Usertags: nonfree-doc rfc Hi! It seems the problem reported (and solved, thanks!) in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572606 was re-introduced with this upload. Thanks, /Simon -- To