Bug#584026: printconf: Security bugs in ghostscript

Dear Chris, I now see what tripped me up: in my Packages file, printconf depends on ghostscript, but foomatic-filters doesn't. Maybe that could be fixed? Thanks, Paul Paul Szabo p...@maths.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/ School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sy

Processed: Re: Bug#584026: printconf: Security bugs in ghostscript

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 584026 Bug #584026 {Done: Chris Lawrence } [printconf] printconf: Security bugs in ghostscript > reassign 584026 foomatic-filters Bug #584026 [printconf] printconf: Security bugs in ghostscript Bug reassigned from package 'printconf' to 'f

Bug#584026: printconf: Security bugs in ghostscript

reopen 584026 reassign 584026 foomatic-filters thanks Dear Chris, > ... doesn't apply to printconf. foomatic-filters is the only > Foomatic-related package that is affected by calling gs directly, > and I assume your mass-filed bug reports have hit that one too. Sorry, no. Seems my "pick out p

Bug#584026: printconf: Security bugs in ghostscript

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:47 PM, wrote: > Regardless, this bug (#584026: printconf) is hardly "done". Yes, it is, because it doesn't apply to printconf. foomatic-filters is the only Foomatic-related package that is affected by calling gs directly, and I assume your mass-filed bug reports have

Bug#584026: printconf: Security bugs in ghostscript

Package: printconf Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Please note remote execute-any-code security bugs in ghostscript: http://bugs.debian.org/583183 This package depends on ghostscript, and may be affected. Please evaluate the security of this package, and fix i