Dear Roger,
>>> Have you considered a whole-archive search for e.g. -dSAFER in
>>> the lintian lab? ...
>>
>> Sorry, do not know how to do that search. Can you explain?
>
> One of the Debian machines has the complete unpacked source trees for
> every package in Debian on it, used for running Lint
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 584015 foomatic-db-gutenprint
Bug #584015 [ijsgutenprint] ijsgutenprint: Security bugs in ghostscript
Bug reassigned from package 'ijsgutenprint' to 'foomatic-db-gutenprint'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
reassign 584015 foomatic-db-gutenprint
thanks
On 01/06/10 23:31, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
Dear Roger,
ijsgutenprint is a ghostscript IJS server driver. It's invoked
/by/ ghostscript, so is not itself responsible for running
ghostscript. One potential source of vulnerabilities is
actua
Dear Roger,
> ijsgutenprint is a ghostscript IJS server driver. It's invoked
> /by/ ghostscript, so is not itself responsible for running
> ghostscript. One potential source of vulnerabilities is
> actually in glue scripts such as Foomatic, so I think probably
> should be reassigned to foomatic-
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:11:19AM +1000, Paul Szabo wrote:
> Package: ijsgutenprint
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
>
> Please note remote execute-any-code security bugs in ghostscript:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/583183
>
> This package depends on gho
Package: ijsgutenprint
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please note remote execute-any-code security bugs in ghostscript:
http://bugs.debian.org/583183
This package depends on ghostscript, and may be affected. Please
evaluate the security of this package, and f
6 matches
Mail list logo
