Dear Martin-Eric,
> ... We already call -dSAFER and drop privileges early, so we're
> already protected as it is. Closing.
Sorry, you seem to misunderstand: this bug is (more-or-less) about the
need to use the -P- also, as well as -dSAFER, to be protected.
Is cups-pdf "part of" cups? In that cas
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Paul Szabo wrote:
> Package: cups-pdf
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
>
> Please note remote execute-any-code security bugs in ghostscript:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/583183
>
> This package depends on ghostscript, and may b
2 matches
Mail list logo
