Hi,
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 04:07:34PM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> >But then the version is a release candidate version from 2008, and the popcon
> >inst count is currently 3. I think it should at least be dropped from
> >squeeze
> >in order to make clamav supportable.
> >
> >I will do so i
Hi Philipp,
But then the version is a release candidate version from 2008, and the popcon
inst count is currently 3. I think it should at least be dropped from squeeze
in order to make clamav supportable.
I will do so in a week if nobody speaks up.
That's fine with me. There are some plans t
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:47:54PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > c-icap links against libclamav and is thus affected by #577013. As such
> > it needs to be moved to volatile.debian.org and blocked out of stable
> > with a RC blocker bug.
> >
> > Alternatively the clamav module could
Hi!
* Moritz Muehlenhoff [100519 23:14]:
> c-icap links against libclamav and is thus affected by #577013. As such
> it needs to be moved to volatile.debian.org and blocked out of stable
> with a RC blocker bug.
>
> Alternatively the clamav module could be dropped.
Guessing from the package de
Package: c-icap
Severity: serious
c-icap links against libclamav and is thus affected by #577013. As such
it needs to be moved to volatile.debian.org and blocked out of stable
with a RC blocker bug.
Alternatively the clamav module could be dropped.
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
5 matches
Mail list logo