I'm not aware of any alternative for javascript coverage packaged in
debian. So if possible I would like to keep it in unstable.
Sure, it doesn't seem upstream is actively developing it anymore.
On Sep 2, 2012 1:39 AM, "David Prévot" wrote:
> Control: found -1 0.3.1-1
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 08:51:40PM +0100, Johan Euphrosine wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Enrico Zini
> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
>
Control: found -1 0.3.1-1
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 08:51:40PM +0100, Johan Euphrosine wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > thank you for maintaining jscoverage.
> >
> > jscoverage 0.3.1-1 is currently in squeeze and sid and has RC bugs open
> > again
Processing control commands:
> found -1 0.3.1-1
Bug #579227 [src:jscoverage] Embedded code copy: libmozjs
Marked as found in versions jscoverage/0.3.1-1.
--
579227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thank you for maintaining jscoverage.
>
> jscoverage 0.3.1-1 is currently in squeeze and sid and has RC bugs open
> against it.
>
> Considering that the package has a very small number of users, that
> we're supposed to release fairl
Hello,
thank you for maintaining jscoverage.
jscoverage 0.3.1-1 is currently in squeeze and sid and has RC bugs open
against it.
Considering that the package has a very small number of users, that
we're supposed to release fairly soon, and that this issue looks not
that easy to solve, it may be
6 matches
Mail list logo
