found 565765 1.9.1.376-1
thanks
On 07/03/10 at 09:46 +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> > Something else that puzzles me is that ruby1.9.1 1.9.1.376-1 (the
> > version currently in testing) built fine on sparc back in August, when
> > it was uploaded. See
> > https://buil
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 565765 1.9.1.376-1
Bug #565765 [src:ruby1.9.1] ruby1.9.1: FTBFS on sparc
Bug Marked as found in versions ruby1.9.1/1.9.1.376-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> Something else that puzzles me is that ruby1.9.1 1.9.1.376-1 (the
> version currently in testing) built fine on sparc back in August, when
> it was uploaded. See
> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=ruby1.9.1;ver=1.9.1.376-1;arch=sparc;stamp=126038086
>
> Marc, could
On 25/02/10 at 11:29 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 05:30:29PM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> > > Any chance of upgrading one of the buildds to 2.6.32 to see if it
> > > helps?
> >
> > DSA told me that they do not want to run any non-standard (aka,
> > non-Debian stable)
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 05:30:29PM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Any chance of upgrading one of the buildds to 2.6.32 to see if it
> > helps?
>
> DSA told me that they do not want to run any non-standard (aka,
> non-Debian stable) kernel on these machines, not even for short
> tests. I'm n
Jurij Smakov writes:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 05:06:04PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> I think that the two remaining options are:
>> (1) remove the ruby1.9.1 binaries for sparc, and have ruby1.9.1 added to
>> P-a-s on sparc.
>> (2) accept that ruby1.9.1 can only be built on porter boxes, not o
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 05:06:04PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 22/02/10 at 17:30 +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Jurij Smakov writes:
> > > On spontini:
> > >
> > > Linux spontini 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Thu Feb 11 03:39:06 UTC 2010
> > > sparc64 GNU/Linux
> > >
> > > cat /proc/cpui
On 22/02/10 at 17:30 +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> Jurij Smakov writes:
> > On spontini:
> >
> > Linux spontini 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Thu Feb 11 03:39:06 UTC 2010
> > sparc64 GNU/Linux
> >
> > cat /proc/cpuinfo
> > cpu : TI UltraSparc II (BlackBird)
> > fpu : Ul
Jurij Smakov writes:
> On spontini:
>
> Linux spontini 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Thu Feb 11 03:39:06 UTC 2010
> sparc64 GNU/Linux
>
> cat /proc/cpuinfo
> cpu : TI UltraSparc II (BlackBird)
> fpu : UltraSparc II integrated FPU
> prom: OBP 3.11.26 1998/04/15 1
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:01:10PM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 05:09:58PM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Marc Brockschmidt writes:
> > [ruby1.9.1 woes]
> > > Sorry for the delay. I've now done a test-build on lebrun, which got
> > > further than our last build-log. I
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 05:09:58PM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> Marc Brockschmidt writes:
> [ruby1.9.1 woes]
> > Sorry for the delay. I've now done a test-build on lebrun, which got
> > further than our last build-log. I didn't finish the build, though, as
> > CPU cycles on sparc are currentl
Hi,
Outcome of the discussion on debian-qa@ about this issue:
- ruby1.9.1 still fails on both lebrun and spontini
- needs to be tried on smetana (porter box with the higher chances to
reproduce the failure)
Any help is welcomed...
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.luc
Marc Brockschmidt writes:
[ruby1.9.1 woes]
> Sorry for the delay. I've now done a test-build on lebrun, which got
> further than our last build-log. I didn't finish the build, though, as
> CPU cycles on sparc are currently needed for the build queue.
>
> I've given back ruby1.9.1 now, let's see if
Jurij Smakov writes:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:22:27PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:13:02AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>> > Josip, are you running lebrun these days? Can you try reproducing the
>> > failure there and getting more information about it (logs are not ve
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 11:41:51AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > > > Josip, are you running lebrun these days? Can you try reproducing the
> > > > > failure there and getting more information about it (logs are not
> > > > > very
> > > > > informative)? I'm a bit reluctant to do a porter uplo
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 08:17:51AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 23/01/10 at 12:04 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:22:27PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:13:02AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > > Josip, are you running lebrun these days? Ca
On 23/01/10 at 12:04 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:22:27PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:13:02AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > Josip, are you running lebrun these days? Can you try reproducing the
> > > failure there and getting more informat
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:22:27PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:13:02AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > Josip, are you running lebrun these days? Can you try reproducing the
> > failure there and getting more information about it (logs are not very
> > informative)? I'm a
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:13:02AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:33:47PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 18/01/10 at 23:59 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:58:18AM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > Package: src:ruby1.9.1
> > > > Version: 1
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:33:47PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 18/01/10 at 23:59 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:58:18AM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Package: src:ruby1.9.1
> > > Version: 1.9.1.378-1
> > > Severity: serious
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > ruby1.9
On 18/01/10 at 23:59 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:58:18AM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: src:ruby1.9.1
> > Version: 1.9.1.378-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > ruby1.9.1 FTBFS on sparc with the following error:
> > > make[2]: Leaving directory
> > >
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:58:18AM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: src:ruby1.9.1
> Version: 1.9.1.378-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> ruby1.9.1 FTBFS on sparc with the following error:
> > make[2]: Leaving directory
> > `/build/buildd-ruby1.9.1_1.9.1.378-1-sparc-KMvrBv/ruby1.9.1-1.9.1.3
Package: src:ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.1.378-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
ruby1.9.1 FTBFS on sparc with the following error:
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/build/buildd-ruby1.9.1_1.9.1.378-1-sparc-KMvrBv/ruby1.9.1-1.9.1.378'
> compiling bigdecimal
> Aborted
> make[1]: *** [mkmain.sh] Error 134
> make:
23 matches
Mail list logo
