Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 640495 -1
Bug#640495: libspf0 going away
Bug 640495 cloned as bug 648605.
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #648605 [spfmilter] libspf0 going away
Bug reassigned from package 'spfmilter' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle -1 RM: spfmilter -- RoM
clone 640495 -1
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 RM: spfmilter -- RoM; unmaintained upstream, dep to be dropped from
sid
severity -1 normal
thanks
Hi Mike,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 05:37:35PM -0800, Mike Markley wrote:
> I did reply -- only I forgot to actually send it. Oops.
oops, ok. :)
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 02:07:14PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> clone 564576 -1
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
> retitle -1 RM: libspf -- RoQA; unmaintained, buggy
> severity -1 normal
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:05:55PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:56:32AM
clone 564576 -1
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 RM: libspf -- RoQA; unmaintained, buggy
severity -1 normal
thanks
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:05:55PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:56:32AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I replied directly, rather than to the bug by
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 564576 -1
Bug#564576: libspf0: fails with IPv6
Bug 564576 cloned as bug 648510.
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #648510 [libspf0] libspf0: fails with IPv6
Bug reassigned from package 'libspf0' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Bug No longer marked as f
Mike,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 07:06:10PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:16:20PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Upgrading now. I'll ask for libspf0's removal at the end of the
> > month.
> You can remove whitelsiter, I don't maintain (upstream) it anymore.
any opinion
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 640496 RM: whitelister -- ROM; unmaintained upstream, obsolete
Bug #640496 [whitelister] libspf0 going away
Changed Bug title to 'RM: whitelister -- ROM; unmaintained upstream, obsolete'
from 'libspf0 going away'
> reassign 640496 ftp.deb
retitle 640496 RM: whitelister -- ROM; unmaintained upstream, obsolete
reassign 640496 ftp.debian.org
thanks
Hi Pierre,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 07:06:10PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> You can remove whitelsiter, I don't maintain (upstream) it anymore.
then let's do that. ;)
Kind regards and
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:16:20PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> severity 640496 serious
> severity 640495 serious
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:05:55PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:56:32AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > I replied directly, rather than to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 640496 serious
Bug #640496 [whitelister] libspf0 going away
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 640495 serious
Bug #640495 [spfmilter] libspf0 going away
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping pro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 564576 -1
Bug#564576: libspf0: fails with IPv6
Bug 564576 cloned as bug 640495.
> clone 564576 -2
Bug#564576: libspf0: fails with IPv6
Bug 564576 cloned as bug 640496.
> reassign -1 spfmilter
Bug #640495 [libspf0] libspf0: fails with IPv6
clone 564576 -1
clone 564576 -2
reassign -1 spfmilter
severity -1 important
retitle -1 libspf0 going away
reassign -2 whitelister
severity -2 important
retitle -2 libspf0 going away
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:56:32AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I replied directly, rather than to the bug by mis
Also, I think it does warrant RC severity due to dataloss potential, not due
to release goals. Wheezy will be released in 1.5 - 2 years and supported
until a year after Wheezy +1. That means 4 - 5 years. In that time frame I
think it's highly likely that incorrectly rejecting mail due to lack
I replied directly, rather than to the bug by mistake.
I will contact the maintainers of the two rdepends (spfmilter and whitelister)
to see if they will fix libspf0, port their packages to libspf2 (which does
support IPv6), or have them removed.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:00, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think this should be RC for Wheezy as libspf appears to completely lack IPv6
> support.
why? IPv6 support is a release goal for wheezy, and RG does not
warrant a RC severity: please fix it.
[1] http://release.debian.org/wheezy/goals.txt
15 matches
Mail list logo