On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 10:49:32 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [...] (arguably strchr should have a return type of ‘const char *’,
> which would not have allowed this to happen in the first place),
Errr, actually, that's not correct, the signature is the way it is so
that one can pass a ‘char *’ kno
Hi!
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 20:45:42 +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 03:35:07PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > The patch is the one from Ubuntu which has been posted to the bug log
> > a while ago. The rationale of the patch is that in fact that variable
> > is not being
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:45:42PM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> So, imho, this rather sounds like a bug/misbehavior in libc to me.
> Anyway, I did not have time to dig into that further (and, thus, lost
> track of that bug :-/). Possibly, libc behaves correctly, if the "right"
> defines are used.
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 03:35:07PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for pfstools (versioned as 1.8.1-1.1) and uploaded
> it to DELAYED/2, according to devref §5.11.1.
Thanks a lot for taking care of that!
> The patch is the one from Ubuntu which has been posted to the
tags 554494 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pfstools (versioned as 1.8.1-1.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/2, according to devref §5.11.1. The patch is the one from
Ubuntu which has been posted to the bug log a while ago. The rationale
of the patch is that in fact that va
5 matches
Mail list logo
