On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:30:11PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Hello Gabor,
>
> Gabor Gombas wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:01:51PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> >
> >> However, this is another side of already archived
> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543
Hello Gabor,
Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:01:51PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>
>> However, this is another side of already archived
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543365 (ironically, reported
>> by you too). On i386 we have the issue: libc6-i686 str
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:01:51PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> However, this is another side of already archived
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543365 (ironically, reported
> by you too). On i386 we have the issue: libc6-i686 strictly Pre-Depends on
> libc6 (= ...), and
Hello James,
James Vega wrote:
> Package: cupt
> Version: 1.0.0
> Severity: critical
>
> Running "cupt -R --purge safe-upgrade" today, ended up breaking the
> system because of an incorrect upgrade order. Partway through the
> process, dpkg segfaulted and most other tools also segfaulted due to
Package: cupt
Version: 1.0.0
Severity: critical
Running "cupt -R --purge safe-upgrade" today, ended up breaking the
system because of an incorrect upgrade order. Partway through the
process, dpkg segfaulted and most other tools also segfaulted due to
mis-matching libc package versions. Running "
5 matches
Mail list logo