Bug#541348: cwebm still included in package description

2011-08-16 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Does it really take 2 years to fix this? > > > > One always hopes upstream will change the license. Once it's removed > > from the package, I'm not going through the trouble of adding it in again. > > Shouldn't that be a case of 'quilt remove ...' and editing the >

Processed: Re: Bug#541348: cwebm still included in package description

2011-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 541348 + pending Bug #541348 [emacs-goodies-el] cwebm still included in package description Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 541348: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo

Bug#541348: cwebm still included in package description

2011-08-16 Thread Peter S Galbraith
tags 541348 + pending thanks Ben Hutchings wrote: > It's worse then just the package description - the info file and the > customisation menu also state or imply that cwebm is included, leaving > me to waste time wondering what I had to do make the commands available. Fixed in CVS and pending u

Bug#541348: cwebm still included in package description

2011-08-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:21:25PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > tags 541348 + pending > thanks > > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > It's worse then just the package description - the info file and the > > customisation menu also state or imply that cwebm is included, leaving > > me to waste time

Bug#541348: cwebm still included in package description

2011-08-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
It's worse then just the package description - the info file and the customisation menu also state or imply that cwebm is included, leaving me to waste time wondering what I had to do make the commands available. Does it really take 2 years to fix this? Ben. signature.asc Description: This is