Bug#531668: Bug#552203: Test versions still broken

2010-01-16 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Tony Houghton [100116 17:23 +] > On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:01:08 +0100 > Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > Yeah, could please do as follows: > > > > cd /usr/src > > rm -rf modules > > tar -xjf alsa-driver.tar.bz > > cd /usr/src/modules > > cat /path/to/alsa-source-rules.patch | patch -p1 > > cd

Bug#531668: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#531668: Bug#552203: Test versions still broken

2010-01-16 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Tony Houghton [100116 14:12 +] [...] > Where should I get alsa-driver.tar.bz2 from? Start with the alsa-driver > source package, apply your patch and build it? Yes please. Elimar -- It's a good thing we don't get all the government we pay for. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b

Bug#531668: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#531668: Bug#552203: Test versions still broken

2010-01-16 Thread Tony Houghton
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:01:08 +0100 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > * Tony Houghton [100111 21:00 +] > [...] > > m-a should be able to find the headers automatically. It certainly knows > > all about the headers-*-common and headers-*-arch packages because it > > downloads them if they aren't alre

Bug#531668: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#531668: Bug#552203: Test versions still broken

2010-01-16 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Tony Houghton [100111 21:00 +] [...] > m-a should be able to find the headers automatically. It certainly knows > all about the headers-*-common and headers-*-arch packages because it > downloads them if they aren't already installed. I think the problem is > because the alsa package finds th

Bug#531668: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#531668: Bug#552203: Test versions still broken

2010-01-11 Thread Tony Houghton
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:10:49 +0100 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > What do have distributors like we are to do that modules do compile > a distributed header? A build against a vanilla one suceeded! > (2.6.*) Alsa drivers intention is to build against _every_ 2.6 > series kernel. I know much installa

Bug#531668: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#531668: Bug#552203: Test versions still broken

2010-01-11 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Tony Houghton [100111 17:42 +] > On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:44:48 +0100 > Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > * Tony Houghton [100110 22:51 +] > > > On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:17:44 +0100 > > > Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > > > > > If I run 'make-kpkg kernel-headers' i.e. in my linux-2.6.33-rc3

Bug#531668: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#531668: Bug#552203: Test versions still broken

2010-01-11 Thread Tony Houghton
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:44:48 +0100 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > * Tony Houghton [100110 22:51 +] > > On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:17:44 +0100 > > Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > > > If I run 'make-kpkg kernel-headers' i.e. in my linux-2.6.33-rc3 all > > > those missing headers are packaged. > > >

Bug#561715: Bug#531668: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#531668: Bug#552203: Test versions still broken

2010-01-10 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Tony Houghton [100110 22:51 +] > On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:17:44 +0100 > Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > If I run 'make-kpkg kernel-headers' i.e. in my linux-2.6.33-rc3 all > > those missing headers are packaged. > > Does that also work if you run make-kpkg in a vanilla 2.6.32 kernel > tree?

Bug#561695: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#531668: Bug#552203: Test versions still broken

2010-01-10 Thread Tony Houghton
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:17:44 +0100 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > If I run 'make-kpkg kernel-headers' i.e. in my linux-2.6.33-rc3 all > those missing headers are packaged. Does that also work if you run make-kpkg in a vanilla 2.6.32 kernel tree? > I've no idea why since > linux-headers-2.6-$arch+2

Bug#552203: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#531668: Bug#552203: Test versions still broken

2010-01-10 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Elimar Riesebieter [100110 16:50 +0100] > * Tony Houghton [100110 14:30 +] > > I can't build the test version against 2.6.32 either, build log > > attached. > > > > I think there must be a good reason why the kernel deb maintainers added > > their patches and that if you want to maintain a m