On Wed, 27 May 2009 12:27:58 +0200 Davide Puricelli wrote:
[...]
> Hi again,
Hi! :)
>
> I spoke with Daniele and we agreed to have linuxfacile removed from
> Debian, the manual was written years ago and it's really outdated right
> now, so this seems to be the best thing to do.
Well, if it's
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:33:44PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Good, I hope Daniele (and any other copyright holders) may be persuaded
> to re-license or dual-license under a good license, so that the manual
> may become clearly DFSG-free.
>
> Thanks for working on this issue.
Hi again,
I spo
On Wed, 20 May 2009 15:31:49 +0200 Davide Puricelli wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
Hi! :)
>
> thanks for your detailed report,
You're welcome.
> I'll immediately contact Daniele Medri
> and I'll keep you posted about this issue, I feel a bit ashamed that
> I didn't notice the whole thing before.
Go
Hi Francesco,
thanks for your detailed report, I'll immediately contact Daniele Medri
and I'll keep you posted about this issue, I feel a bit ashamed that
I didn't notice the whole thing before.
Regards,
--
Davide Puricelli, dpurice...@tin.it
Debian Developer: e...@debian.org | http://www.debian
Package: linuxfacile
Version: 5.0.new-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: nonfree-doc gfdl
Hi!
This package is licensed under the
| terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any
| later version published by the Free So
5 matches
Mail list logo
