On 1 April 2009 at 12:50, Scott Kitterman wrote:
| >It's easy to fix so I probably do that --- but are you sure it is in fact a
| >strict requirement?
| >
|
| Yes. I think this just got by ftp-master in New by mistake. I think the
source has to be
| distributable and without the license it is
>It's easy to fix so I probably do that --- but are you sure it is in fact a
>strict requirement?
>
Yes. I think this just got by ftp-master in New by mistake. I think the
source has to be
distributable and without the license it is not.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@l
On 1 April 2009 at 12:16, Scott Kitterman wrote:
| In the source package inst/LICENSE-Rcpp.txt is a partial copy of the LGPL. As
| I understand it, a full copy of the license is required in the source.
It's easy to fix so I probably do that --- but are you sure it is in fact a
strict requirement?
Package: rcpp
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
In the source package inst/LICENSE-Rcpp.txt is a partial copy of the LGPL. As
I understand it, a full copy of the license is required in the source.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers jaunty-updates
4 matches
Mail list logo
