Bug#514132: I'd consider this bug very serious

2009-02-07 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Martin Pitt writes: > Martin Pitt [2009-02-05 23:57 +0100]: >> TBH this is not really the time to fiddle with it, for Lenny I'd just >> back out the original change completely. > > Done and uploaded, debdiff attached. Unblocked by luk, this will go into lenny soonish. Marc -- Fachbegriffe der I

Bug#514132: I'd consider this bug very serious

2009-02-05 Thread Martin Pitt
found 514132 95 found 472627 94lenny1 thanks Hello again, Martin Pitt [2009-02-05 23:57 +0100]: > TBH this is not really the time to fiddle with it, for Lenny I'd just > back out the original change completely. Done and uploaded, debdiff attached. @release team: This is a direct revert of the c

Bug#514132: I'd consider this bug very serious

2009-02-05 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello all, Adeodato Simó [2009-02-05 14:02 +0100]: > If I'm not mistaken, you're a PostgreSQL-savy persion, so in the absence > of the maintainer's opinion, I think it's appropriate to take your assessment > on the severity of this bug. It doesn't match "grave" in the text book sense of the Debia

Bug#514132: I'd consider this bug very serious

2009-02-05 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Raphael Hertzog 2009-02-05 <20090205125948.gb16...@rivendell> > Do you mean that it is a regression compared to etch ? If yes, I agree > that it should be RC. It is a regression: [0] 14:49 m...@etch-amd64.volta:/etc/postgresql/8.1 1j $ sudo pg_ctlcluster 8.1 db2 start [0] 14:50 m...@etch-am

Bug#514132: I'd consider this bug very serious

2009-02-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 01:59:48PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Thu, 05 Feb 2009, Michael Meskes wrote: > > severity 514132 grave > > thanks > > > > I beg to disagree. This bug will break a lot (my personal guess is about > > 80%) > > of postgresql clusters as the setup Bernd describes is

Bug#514132: I'd consider this bug very serious

2009-02-05 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Michael Meskes [Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:34:54 +0100]: > severity 514132 grave > thanks > I beg to disagree. This bug will break a lot (my personal guess is about 80%) > of postgresql clusters as the setup Bernd describes is a de facto standard. > Therefore I consider grave as the right severity. Ho

Bug#514132: I'd consider this bug very serious

2009-02-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009, Michael Meskes wrote: > severity 514132 grave > thanks > > I beg to disagree. This bug will break a lot (my personal guess is about 80%) > of postgresql clusters as the setup Bernd describes is a de facto standard. Do you mean that it is a regression compared to etch ? If yes