On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Christophe Prud'homme
wrote:
> Yup
>
> i am travelling a lot these days. I may not be able to make the upload
> before next week
>
> let me know if that's ok with you
No, that is not ok. :) So I'll make the upload, but what should I do
about the svn, which already
Yup
i am travelling a lot these days. I may not be able to make the upload
before next week
let me know if that's ok with you
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>>> Yep. But the build you attached actually builds the pac
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>> Yep. But the build you attached actually builds the package. Where
>> is the problem?
>
> I fail to see a problem :) I started the build with high expectations
> on trying to fix an RC bug. But the bug is not there. The package is
> at least b
> Yep. But the build you attached actually builds the package. Where
> is the problem?
I fail to see a problem :) I started the build with high expectations
on trying to fix an RC bug. But the bug is not there. The package is
at least buildable on your i386 and on my AMD64, under (supposedly)
iden
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Find the build log attached to this mail - Amazing, almost two hours
> under a quite-decent system! :-}
Yep. But the build you attached actually builds the package. Where is
the problem?
>
> FWIW, I used cowbuilder (not pbuilder) as a build e
Hi Gunnar,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> tags 513074 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> I just built this package under a freshly updated cowbuilder on
> amd64. It failed to fail to build from source.
>
> I am _not_ attaching a build log, as -as I'm sure you are aware-
tags 513074 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
I just built this package under a freshly updated cowbuilder on
amd64. It failed to fail to build from source.
I am _not_ attaching a build log, as -as I'm sure you are aware- the
paraview build is a _very_ lengthy one, and I didn't request it at the
begi
Package: paraview
Version: 3.2.3-4
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi, paraview fails to build in my freshly updated pbuilder on amd64. (I am
sending the email from i386).
I think this is a serious bug.
[ 57%] Built target Cone6
make[6]: Entering directory
`
8 matches
Mail list logo
