Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free)

2010-08-31 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:19:51 -0400, Stephen van Egmond wrote: > On a practical level this issue is a colossal waste of time. We have > established: debian isn't solely guided by practicality, but instead by more fundamentally interesting principles. > 1) The package is useful > 2) The identity o

Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free)

2010-08-31 Thread Stephen van Egmond
On a practical level this issue is a colossal waste of time. We have established: 1) The package is useful 2) The identity of the copyright holder is ambiguous, even to themselves 3) The probability of action to enforce a license violation claim is basically nil Removing the package from distri

Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free)

2010-08-31 Thread Michael Gilbert
reopen 509287 thanks > I forgot to close the bug previously. > > We collected many information and it comes out that the > software was intendet to be distributed freely. intention is not sufficient. the license itself as written must be interpretable as dfsg-free. i think the package needs to

Processed: Re: Please give opinion about "Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free"

2008-12-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 509287 important Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free

2008-12-27 Thread Erik Schanze
Hi Marc, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt : > severity 509287 serious > tags 509287 + lenny-ignore > thanks > > Erik Schanze writes: > > severity 509287 important > > thanks > > > > "Michael Gilbert" : > >> the license for afio is non-free. see > >> /usr/share/doc/afio/copyright: > >> > >> i'm marking thi

Bug#509287: Please give opinion about "Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free"

2008-12-27 Thread k.holtman
Dear All, As the afio upstream maintainer I am currently working off-list with some people to clarify the background the afio license text, how and when it got updated and interpreted, and what were the historical intentions of the authors involved. We are making some progress. I expect that

Processed: Re: Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free

2008-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 509287 serious Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free Severity set to `serious' from `important' > tags 509287 + lenny-ignore Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny-ignore &

Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free

2008-12-26 Thread Erik Schanze
severity 509287 important thanks Hi Michael, "Michael Gilbert" : > Package: afio > Version: 2.5-5 > Severity: serious > > the license for afio is non-free. see /usr/share/doc/afio/copyright: > i'm marking this as serious for now since this is a DFSG violation, > but i can appreciate a decision

Processed: Re: Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free

2008-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 509287 important Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Bug#509287: Please give opinion about "Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free"

2008-12-22 Thread Koen Holtman
Hi all, Few comments below... On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:00:16 +0100 Erik Schanze wrote: > > [...] > > I got a Bug against package "afio" because of licence problems. > > Please see http://bugs.debian.org/509287. > > > > There was already a similar Bug

Bug#509287: Please give opinion about "Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free"

2008-12-22 Thread MJ Ray
Erik Schanze wrote: > What should I do? > Have I move afio to non-free? Thank you for bringing this question to the list - I was going to do so, but had not found time yet. More seriously, the Lachman Associates licence doesn't give any permission to modify the software, does it? So, I feel we

Bug#509287: Please give opinion about "Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free"

2008-12-21 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:00:16 +0100 Erik Schanze wrote: [...] > I got a Bug against package "afio" because of licence problems. > Please see http://bugs.debian.org/509287. > > There was already a similar Bug 9 years ago that was closed, after one > person from this list gave his OK. > (http://lis

Bug#509287: Please give opinion about "Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free"

2008-12-21 Thread Florian Weimer
* Erik Schanze: > There is an ongoing discussion on a Redhat list > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 and they excluded > the package already. There is an other blog on > http://www.kernelplanet.org/fedora/ that gave a summary of the current > situation. I think the analysis

Bug#509287: Please give opinion about "Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free"

2008-12-20 Thread Erik Schanze
Dear debian-legal folks, I got a Bug against package "afio" because of licence problems. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/509287. There was already a similar Bug 9 years ago that was closed, after one person from this list gave his OK. (http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/1999/05/msg00162.html

Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free

2008-12-20 Thread Michael Gilbert
Package: afio Version: 2.5-5 Severity: serious the license for afio is non-free. see /usr/share/doc/afio/copyright: * -- * * License notice 1, covering part of this software package. * * [Covers the original 1985 afio