Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Yes. That helps.
>
> The two scripts provide a similar function, but python-dkim only does DKIM
> signing/verification. It does not implement the policy component, so it's
> dkimverify can't provide a complete equivalent of the one in dkimproxy.
>
> I do think their p
Yes. That helps.
The two scripts provide a similar function, but python-dkim only does DKIM
signing/verification. It does not implement the policy component, so it's
dkimverify can't provide a complete equivalent of the one in dkimproxy.
I do think their purposes are slightly different. The
Thomas Goirand 12/18/08 1:49 AM >>>
>
>Now, would it be easy for you to rename dkimverify to something else? I
>have put the upstream author (Jason) of dkimproxy as a copy of his email
>so he can tell what kind of problems we might find if we rename
dkimverify.
I don't know the full context
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I guess the first question is are they suitable as alternatives? If not,
> I'll rename.
>
> The python-dkim dkimverify takes a message in on stdin and let's you know
> if it verified by the exit code
>
> How does dkimproxy's work?
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of dkimproxy.
I guess the first question is are they suitable as alternatives? If not,
I'll rename.
The python-dkim dkimverify takes a message in on stdin and let's you know
if it verified by the exit code
How does dkimproxy's work?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Package: python-dkim
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:
Date: 2008-12-16
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Command:
6 matches
Mail list logo
