On Wednesday 03 December 2008 21:53:49 Steffen Joeris wrote:
> Please go ahead.
>
> Next time a debdiff would be nice, but I do not have a problem to filter it
> out of the upload for testing-security.
Here is a debdiff. I have to re-upload, I assumed I didn't have to do a -sa
upload, but apparen
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:55:42 pm Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 December 2008 15:10:12 Frederic Peters wrote:
> > Mark Purcell wrote:
> > > On Monday 24 November 2008 22:58:38 Steffen Joeris wrote:
> > > > Packages for lenny and sid build fine with the patch, I haven't
> > > > tested t
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 15:10:12 Frederic Peters wrote:
> Mark Purcell wrote:
> > On Monday 24 November 2008 22:58:38 Steffen Joeris wrote:
> > > Packages for lenny and sid build fine with the patch, I haven't tested
> > > them though. Could you get back to me wrt fixes for lenny?
> >
> > Fre
Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Monday 24 November 2008 22:58:38 Steffen Joeris wrote:
> > Packages for lenny and sid build fine with the patch, I haven't tested them
> > though. Could you get back to me wrt fixes for lenny?
>
> Frederic, Joost,
>
> This RC bug, with patch, has been filed against your
On Monday 24 November 2008 22:58:38 Steffen Joeris wrote:
> Packages for lenny and sid build fine with the patch, I haven't tested them
> though. Could you get back to me wrt fixes for lenny?
Frederic, Joost,
This RC bug, with patch, has been filed against your package for over a week
without a
Package: wireshark
Severity: grave
Tags: security, patch
Justification: user security hole
Hi
the following remotely exploitable vulnerability in Wireshark's
SMTP dissector has been reported:
References:
http://packetstormsecurity.org/0811-advisories/wireshark104-dos.txt
http://bugs.gentoo.org/sh
6 matches
Mail list logo
