Julian Field writes:
> On 25/12/08 21:38, Nico Golde wrote:
>> I'm afraid this is too late, mailscanner has already been
>> removed from lenny.
> Shame you couldn't wait 6 days for the new stable release. I don't
> immediately release a new stable release after making lots of changes to
> ensure i
Hi,
* Simon Walter [2008-12-25 00:43]:
> "Gabor FUNK" writes:
[...]
> Current state of this work is: It works (MailScanner starts and scans
> a simple textmail) but it's not well tested. There still need to be
> done some testing with TNEF attachment, virus removal and some other
> cases.
>
>
On 25/12/08 21:38, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
* Simon Walter [2008-12-25 00:43]:
"Gabor FUNK" writes:
[...]
Current state of this work is: It works (MailScanner starts and scans
a simple textmail) but it's not well tested. There still need to be
done some testing with TNEF attach
On Friday 26 December 2008 00:20, Julian Field wrote:
> > I'm afraid this is too late, mailscanner has already been
> > removed from lenny.
>
> Shame you couldn't wait 6 days for the new stable release. I don't
> immediately release a new stable release after making lots of changes to
> ensure it h
Hi
"Gabor FUNK" writes:
>> mailscanner #506353
>> The maintainer Simon Walter writes:
>>In the current state the package should not be part of
>>the lenny release.
>>I'm in no position to fix all this. I'm not familiar enough with
>>the MailScanner sourcecode and I'm not able to
I'm forwarding this I got from Julian (mailscanner upstream).
G.
- Original Message -
From: "Julian Field"
To: "Gabor FUNK"
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#506353: lenny removal requests
The vulnerabilities in MailScanner have
so here are three RC bugs with maintainers clearly indicating that they
don't want the buggy packages to release and none look like they will be
fixed. The package do not have reverse dependencies, so they seem to be
good for removal.
mailscanner #506353
The maintainer Simon Walter writes:
Hi,
so here are three RC bugs with maintainers clearly indicating that they
don't want the buggy packages to release and none look like they will be
fixed. The package do not have reverse dependencies, so they seem to be
good for removal.
xml2rfc #506652
The maintainer Florian Weimer:
This me
8 matches
Mail list logo