* Thiemo Seufer [Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:11:43 +0100]:
> Mark Purcell wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 October 2008 04:06:20 Luca Bruno wrote:
> > > if the release team
> > > really sees this as an issue needing an immediate fix, I won't object to
> > > the choice (and if Thiemo is already there I won't be
Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 October 2008 04:06:20 Luca Bruno wrote:
> > if the release team
> > really sees this as an issue needing an immediate fix, I won't object to
> > the choice (and if Thiemo is already there I won't be against a quick
> > NMU targeting only #500418, as I'll probab
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 04:06:20 Luca Bruno wrote:
> if the release team
> really sees this as an issue needing an immediate fix, I won't object to
> the choice (and if Thiemo is already there I won't be against a quick
> NMU targeting only #500418, as I'll probably be busy in the next few
> d
Thiemo Seufer scrisse:
> I can do a NMU if they are short on time. (And iff the bugs remains
> flagged as RC, as Developer's Reference 5.10.2.2 recommends.)
Sorry for not replying early on this. My intention was to wait after
lenny to fix both #500418 and 485301 at once.
While the architecture d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 500418 serious
Bug#500418: Please re-enable istanbul builds on mips/mipsel
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
severity 500418 serious
thanks
Mark Purcell wrote:
> severity 500418 important
> thanks
>
> On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:57:39 Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > severity 500418 serious
> [...]
> > Please add hppa mips mipsel to the allowed architectures in debian/control.
>
> Thiemo,
>
> Whilst I agree
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 19:39:16 Philipp Kern wrote:
> The maintainer of the package worked around some buildd problem,
Philipp,
I agree.
The question remains, is it RC, ie serious, or important for the maintainer to
restore the missing archs - hppa mips mipsel.
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Mark,
am Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 07:09:02PM +1100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> Whilst I agree is is important for hppa mips & mipsel to be supported
> architectures I don't think the build of istanbul on these arches is
> release critical for lenny nor does it make the package unfit for
> releas
severity 500418 important
thanks
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:57:39 Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> severity 500418 serious
[...]
> Please add hppa mips mipsel to the allowed architectures in debian/control.
Thiemo,
Whilst I agree is is important for hppa mips & mipsel to be supported
architectures I d
9 matches
Mail list logo
