On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyways, why is apt-cache policy as root faster than as user? My first
> test was as root, now I tested as a user and I got 2-3s delay :(
It seems to be fast if /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin is up to date and
it can update th
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:40:47 +0200 Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > lsb_release is quick here:
> > # time lsb_release -i -s
> > Debian
> > lsb_release -i -s 0.13s user 0.08s system 80% cpu 0.256 total
> >
> > and it does for sure
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lsb_release is quick here:
> # time lsb_release -i -s
> Debian
> lsb_release -i -s 0.13s user 0.08s system 80% cpu 0.256 total
>
> and it does for sure not run apt-cache
$ grep apt-cache /usr/bin/lsb_release
# This should
Oh, now I saw that should be a fix for #491388...
lsb_release is quick here:
# time lsb_release -i -s
Debian
lsb_release -i -s 0.13s user 0.08s system 80% cpu 0.256 total
and it does for sure not run apt-cache
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Hey,
why not just use
DISTRO=$(lsb_release -i -s);
Thats shorter, better readable, and works as expected ;)
Regards
Evgeni
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5 matches
Mail list logo