On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 04:23:22PM -0400, Jason Riedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> And Sven Joachim writes:
> > They are not necessary since the problem is in apt, see #499322.
>
> Thanks! Should I file a wishlist for aptitude's lack of diagnostic
> output? It'd be nice if aptitude p
And Sven Joachim writes:
> They are not necessary since the problem is in apt, see #499322.
Thanks! Should I file a wishlist for aptitude's lack of diagnostic
output? It'd be nice if aptitude pointed at the culprit when something
under it fails...
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
reassign 499555 apt 0.7.15~exp1
merge 499322 499555
thanks
On 2008-09-19 20:30 +0200, Jason Riedy wrote:
> Package: aptitude
> Version: 0.4.11.10-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Ka-boom. Makes installing debug libraries a pain, and I'm on a *slow* network
> ri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 499555 apt 0.7.15~exp1
Bug#499555: aptitude safe-upgrade (and pretty much everything else) segfaults.
Bug reassigned from package `aptitude' to `apt'.
> merge 499322 499555
Bug#499322: apt 0.7.15~1exp1 needs a soname bump
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.11.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Ka-boom. Makes installing debug libraries a pain, and I'm on a *slow* network
right now, so the following backtrace does not include debug symbols.
nan:~# aptitude safe-upgrade
Reading package lists..
5 matches
Mail list logo