On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 02:37:35PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> Would you mind sponsoring an upload of version 3.2 ?
I unfortunately won't have time to do the appropriate checks required by
sponsorship. I already spent too much time looking for what was wrong
with libtrash (and I did only beca
Hi, Mike
What you report here is indeed *grave*
I am about to package version 3.2 per another user's request
(otherwise, I would have requested this package's removal from the
Archive in light of this)
Mike Hommey wrote:
> severity 488467 grave
> retitle 488467 libtrash is dangerously br
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Although this patch makes things worse, I strongly advise to audit the
I meant better, not worse.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 488467 grave
Bug#488467: SEGFAULT in libtrash when using ls -l
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> retitle 488467 libtrash is dangerously broken on amd64
Bug#488467: SEGFAULT in libtrash when using ls -l
Changed Bug ti
4 matches
Mail list logo