Bug#488467: SEGFAULT in libtrash when using ls -l

2008-06-29 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 02:37:35PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote: > Would you mind sponsoring an upload of version 3.2 ? I unfortunately won't have time to do the appropriate checks required by sponsorship. I already spent too much time looking for what was wrong with libtrash (and I did only beca

Bug#488467: SEGFAULT in libtrash when using ls -l

2008-06-29 Thread José Luis Tallón
Hi, Mike What you report here is indeed *grave* I am about to package version 3.2 per another user's request (otherwise, I would have requested this package's removal from the Archive in light of this) Mike Hommey wrote: > severity 488467 grave > retitle 488467 libtrash is dangerously br

Bug#488467: SEGFAULT in libtrash when using ls -l

2008-06-29 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Although this patch makes things worse, I strongly advise to audit the I meant better, not worse. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#488467: SEGFAULT in libtrash when using ls -l

2008-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 488467 grave Bug#488467: SEGFAULT in libtrash when using ls -l Severity set to `grave' from `important' > retitle 488467 libtrash is dangerously broken on amd64 Bug#488467: SEGFAULT in libtrash when using ls -l Changed Bug ti