Bug#481628: libffi-bug

2008-05-21 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Andreas Barth wrote: > * Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080521 12:13]: > > that looks ok for now, we can work on the unification of the headers > > later. > > In case Thiemo agrees (or doesn't disagree) - do you plan to upload it? > Should I NMU it? ...? I disagree, because I was confused ab

Bug#481628: libffi-bug

2008-05-21 Thread Matthias Klose
that looks ok for now, we can work on the unification of the headers later. Matthias Arthur Loiret writes: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:26:40PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > how do we continue here? Is the issue "just" that the headers are being > > moved twice? This bug blocks testing migrat

Bug#481628: libffi-bug

2008-05-21 Thread Andreas Barth
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080521 12:13]: > that looks ok for now, we can work on the unification of the headers > later. In case Thiemo agrees (or doesn't disagree) - do you plan to upload it? Should I NMU it? ...? Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSU

Bug#481628: libffi-bug

2008-05-21 Thread Arthur Loiret
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:26:40PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > how do we continue here? Is the issue "just" that the headers are being > moved twice? This bug blocks testing migration of python2.5 and epiphany > which is a precondition for getting gcc-4.3 and gcc-defaults moved. The fix in the e

Bug#481628: libffi-bug

2008-05-20 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, how do we continue here? Is the issue "just" that the headers are being moved twice? This bug blocks testing migration of python2.5 and epiphany which is a precondition for getting gcc-4.3 and gcc-defaults moved. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e