Bug#477454: RFS: quodlibet (1.0.ds1-1)

2008-06-04 Thread Tristan Seligmann
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-03 22:51:16 -0400]: > Tristan Seligmann wrote: > > Well, fair enough; I suppose the README.Debian note should not be quite > > as explicit as I made it. I'm just not very happy with the gratuitous > > (in my view) change to the upstream tarball, so I wanted

Bug#477454: RFS: quodlibet (1.0.ds1-1)

2008-06-03 Thread Joey Hess
Tristan Seligmann wrote: > Well, fair enough; I suppose the README.Debian note should not be quite > as explicit as I made it. I'm just not very happy with the gratuitous > (in my view) change to the upstream tarball, so I wanted to be as clear > about it as I could for anyone else wondering why it

Bug#477454: RFS: quodlibet (1.0.ds1-1)

2008-06-03 Thread Tristan Seligmann
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-03 17:53:23 -0400]: > If the presense of this buried in an internal source file is so > vile/illegal/unlike other profanity in software in Debian that you have to > *repackage* the upstream tarball to hide it from the tender eyes of our users > (with all th