Bug#430794: kimwitu-doc: diff for NMU version 10a+1-2.1

Michael Piefel wrote: > I think it's stupid to change a completely built package to fix an > obscure build bug. Really, what's the point. Conformance to the policy > for conformance's sake. The users will have to install an updated > package with not a single bit changed. I am very sorry that you

Bug#430794: kimwitu-doc: diff for NMU version 10a+1-2.1

I think it's stupid to change a completely built package to fix an obscure build bug. Really, what's the point. Conformance to the policy for conformance's sake. The users will have to install an updated package with not a single bit changed. Bye, Mike -- From the Social Contract: "Our priorit

Bug#430794: kimwitu-doc: diff for NMU version 10a+1-2.1

tags 430794 + patch tags 430794 + pending thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my kimwitu-doc 10a+1-2.1 NMU. By just build-depending on ghsotscript this FTBFS goes away. I know ghostscript is broken atm, but that will eventually change at some point. I will upload to DELAYED/7, please give some