John Hasler wrote:
> Luk writes:
>> ...it would be better if you upload with a version between stable and
>> unstable.
>
> I don't know what you mean by that.
Uploading the patch to proposed-updates with a version between 2.3.15 and
2.3.16, for instance 2.3.15etch1.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCR
Luk writes:
> ...it would be better if you upload with a version between stable and
> unstable.
I don't know what you mean by that.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
John Hasler wrote:
> Luk writes:
>> Though it might get rejected as the version is higher than the version in
>> testing...
>
> I uploaded to both proposed-updates and to Unstable. If the version is a
> problem the admins can push it through into Testing before installing it in
> Stable.
They wo
Luk writes:
> Though it might get rejected as the version is higher than the version in
> testing...
I uploaded to both proposed-updates and to Unstable. If the version is a
problem the admins can push it through into Testing before installing it in
Stable.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elmw
John Hasler wrote:
> In the archive stable-proposed-updates and proposed-updates are links to
> etch-proposed updates. Yesterday, not having heard back from the admins, I
> tried another experiment and uploaded 2.3.17 to proposed-updates. It
> hasn't bounced so I apparently guessed right this tim
In the archive stable-proposed-updates and proposed-updates are links to
etch-proposed updates. Yesterday, not having heard back from the admins, I
tried another experiment and uploaded 2.3.17 to proposed-updates. It
hasn't bounced so I apparently guessed right this time.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 21:53:47 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
>
>> I uploaded pppconfig 2.3.17 complete with French man page and "Replaces:
>> manpages-fr" to etch-proposed-updates as instructed. Debian Installer
>> responded with:
>>
>> Rejected: Unknown distribution `etch-p
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 21:53:47 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> I uploaded pppconfig 2.3.17 complete with French man page and "Replaces:
> manpages-fr" to etch-proposed-updates as instructed. Debian Installer
> responded with:
>
> Rejected: Unknown distribution `etch-proposed-updates'.
The distrib
I uploaded pppconfig 2.3.17 complete with French man page and "Replaces:
manpages-fr" to etch-proposed-updates as instructed. Debian Installer
responded with:
Rejected: Unknown distribution `etch-proposed-updates'.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:19:50 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I don't see that pppconfig replaces manpages-fr.
>
> Thomas Huriaux writes:
> > See policy 7.5.1.
>
> This looks like a last-resort measure to me. Uploading a version pppconfig
> with the man page deleted makes more sense
I wrote:
> I don't see that pppconfig replaces manpages-fr.
Thomas Huriaux writes:
> See policy 7.5.1.
This looks like a last-resort measure to me. Uploading a version pppconfig
with the man page deleted makes more sense.
> Because this bug is not present neither in unstable nor in testing. It
Hi,
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/05/2007):
> > Could you please explain why you removed the manpage instead of using a
> > replace field as suggested...
>
> I don't see that pppconfig replaces manpages-fr.
See policy 7.5.1.
> In any case, If a French
> man page for pppconfig is in manpag
> Could you please explain why you removed the manpage instead of using a
> replace field as suggested...
I don't see that pppconfig replaces manpages-fr. In any case, If a French
man page for pppconfig is in manpages-fr why should I bloat pppconfig with
another?. It's bloated enough with transl
Hi,
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/05/2007):
> Source: pppconfig
> Source-Version: 2.3.16
>
> pppconfig (2.3.16) unstable; urgency=high
> .
>* Removed French man page.
> Closes: #418350: missing Replaces: manpages-fr (<< 2.39.1-5)
Could you please explain why you removed the manp
14 matches
Mail list logo