On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> same license), but as I already wrote I do not think there's enough
> information to take that as a fact.
You're right. Thanks for your clarifications.
--
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
Mohammed Adnène Trojette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
>> tags 411078 -patch
>> thanks
>
>> > utils/BWidget-1.7.0/ChangeLog: * LICENSE.txt: Removed LGPL license; added
>> > Tcl-license terms.
>> Actually, I have no idea why you think the grep results "sug
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> tags 411078 -patch
> thanks
> > utils/BWidget-1.7.0/ChangeLog: * LICENSE.txt: Removed LGPL license; added
> > Tcl-license terms.
> Actually, I have no idea why you think the grep results "suggest" to
> look into utils/BWidget-1.7.0/LICENSE.txt for the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 411078 -patch
Bug#411078: license.terms for utils/base64/base64.tcl not included
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
tags 411078 -patch
thanks
Mohammed Adnène Trojette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when I look for license.terms in the package, I see this:
>
> % grep -r license.terms *
> utils/base64/yencode.tcl:# See the file "license.terms" for information on
> usage and redistribution
> utils/base64/base64.tc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 411078 + patch
Bug#411078: license.terms for utils/base64/base64.tcl not included
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
tag 411078 + patch
thanks
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> Is it necessary to create a license.terms file here and put it in
> /usr/share/doc/amsn for instance?
> Isn't is sufficient to ask upstream to correct this in a later release?
> Is it worth mentioning in README.Debia
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Er, what? "the authors hereby grant permission to use, copy, modify,
> distribute, and license" doesn't grant to amsn the right to modify?
>
> Yes, there is a missing license statement, and that is a serious bug. But I
> don't understand the claim th
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:19:42PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
utils/base64/base64.tcl's copyright notice contains
# See the file "license.terms" for information on usage and
# redistribution
# of this file, and for a DISCLAIMER OF ALL WARRANTIES.
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:19:42PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> utils/base64/base64.tcl's copyright notice contains
> # See the file "license.terms" for information on usage and
> # redistribution
> # of this file, and for a DISCLAIMER OF ALL WARRANTIES.
> This license.terms file is not incl
Package: amsn
Version: 0.95+dfsg2-0.2
Severity: serious
utils/base64/base64.tcl's copyright notice contains
# See the file "license.terms" for information on usage and
# redistribution
# of this file, and for a DISCLAIMER OF ALL WARRANTIES.
This license.terms file is not included in amsn. It app
11 matches
Mail list logo