Hi Martin
On 4/26/07, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gordon, can you check if LUKS still doesn't work under heavy load with
2.6.21 (I can give you .debs if you want)?
Unfortunately, I can still trigger the problem, although instead of
cryptsetup asking me for the passphrase three
Hi Martin
On 4/26/07, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gordon, can you check if LUKS still doesn't work under heavy load with
2.6.21 (I can give you .debs if you want)?
I should be able to build the debs (I need to set up my machine to do
that anyway). I'll let you know if I have p
* Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-05 01:36]:
> Ok, so here are some interesting results...
>
> I am able to access the LUKS partition on the NSLU2 running 2.6.18
> from subversion (which includes flush_anon_page-generic.patch and
> flush_anon_page-arm.patch) with both cryptsetup-1.
On 1/5/07, Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, I have found that I am unable to access the LUKS partition
when the system is under heavy load and swapping.
Martin, I wonder if this has anything to do with the virtual memory
bug in the kernel that we experienced with apt. It c
On 1/5/07, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-05 01:36]:
> However, I have found that I am unable to access the LUKS partition
> when the system is under heavy load and swapping.
Interesting. Can you check whether you see the same probl
* Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-05 01:36]:
> However, I have found that I am unable to access the LUKS partition
> when the system is under heavy load and swapping.
Interesting. Can you check whether you see the same problems with
FUSE (see #402876)?
> Martin, I wonder if this
On 1/4/07, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-04 12:56]:
> So, can we close the bug against cryptsetup in this case?
#403426 is really about the header corruption which you have fixed in
SVN. It should be closed when the Debian maintain
* Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-04 12:56]:
> > corruption. At least FUSE doesn't work on ARM without those patches,
> > so it seems likely that luksOpen is also affected.
>
> So, can we close the bug against cryptsetup in this case?
#403426 is really about the header corruption
At Wed, 3 Jan 2007 20:37:22 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, it seems to fix the problem and according to the thread on lkml
> the lack of flush_anon_page() on ARM is associated with some
> corruption. At least FUSE doesn't work on ARM without those patches,
> so it se
At Wed, 3 Jan 2007 20:14:42 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-03 17:59]:
> > After a bit of debugging on Gordon's slug, I found out that we have
> > some kind of read race/read corruption when reading the encrypted
> > master ke
* Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-03 20:32]:
> > I just applied the two patches from that thread and successfully ran
> > 'cryptsetup luksClose' on ARM.
>
> "cryptsetup luksClose" is just an alias for "cryptsetup remove". This
> should never fail. What's with luksOpen after the patc
* Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-03 17:59]:
> After a bit of debugging on Gordon's slug, I found out that we have
> some kind of read race/read corruption when reading the encrypted
> master key from a key slot.
...
> As far as I understand page caching comes after dm-crypt, so mayb
At Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:04:41 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-02 18:00]:
> > Does luksDump report the same things on both architecture?
>
> Yes.
After a bit of debugging on Gordon's slug, I found out that we have
some kind of
At Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:04:41 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-02 18:00]:
> > Does luksDump report the same things on both architecture?
>
> Yes.
Strange. Can I somehow gain access to your test box? I'm not entirely
out of gues
* Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-02 18:00]:
> Does luksDump report the same things on both architecture?
Yes.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:13:42 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-30 11:50]:
> > > Is there anything else I should try?
> > > foobar:~# cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sda5 x
> > > Enter LUKS passphrase:
> > > device-mapper: table: 254:0:
* Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-30 11:50]:
> > Is there anything else I should try?
> > foobar:~# cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sda5 x
> > Enter LUKS passphrase:
> > device-mapper: table: 254:0: crypt: Device lookup failed
Strange. I haven't changed cryptsetup but now I don't get this
At Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:24:34 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-29 11:52]:
> > Please try the version from subversion
> > http://luks.endorphin.org/svn/cryptsetup
>
> With 1.0.4 plus the attached 2 patches from SVN I no longer g
* Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-30 04:49]:
> I'm currently preparing a new upload of cryptsetup 1.0.4+svn22, which is
> identical with the current upstream svn snapshot. does this version fix
> bug #403426, or does it still occur?
It still doesn't work on ARM, but with SVN (or
03_no_he
On 29/12/2006 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-29 11:52]:
> > I just added the r!=bsize case to error checking and an error message
> > as well.
> ...
> > The changes are also in subversion.
>
> This particular change didn't make any difference. I still g
* Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-29 11:52]:
> Please try the version from subversion
> http://luks.endorphin.org/svn/cryptsetup
With 1.0.4 plus the attached 2 patches from SVN I no longer get any
corruption but I also cannot access my encrypted data. Is there
anything else I shoul
* Clemens Fruhwirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-29 11:52]:
> I just added the r!=bsize case to error checking and an error message
> as well.
...
> The changes are also in subversion.
This particular change didn't make any difference. I still get the
header conversion message when I only apply t
At Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:15:29 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're seeing corruption of LUKS partition headers on ARM. I've
> confirmed this on two different ARM platforms (IXP4xx and IOP32x) and
> with 2.6.17 and 2.6.18.
>
> Basically, when you create a LUKS partition on a
We're seeing corruption of LUKS partition headers on ARM. I've
confirmed this on two different ARM platforms (IXP4xx and IOP32x) and
with 2.6.17 and 2.6.18.
Basically, when you create a LUKS partition on a PC and then connect
it to an ARM box and open it, you get an "automatic header conversion
f
We're seeing corruption of LUKS partition headers on ARM. I've
confirmed this on two different ARM platforms (IXP4xx and IOP32x) and
with 2.6.17 and 2.6.18.
Basically, when you create a LUKS partition on a PC and then connect
it to an ARM box and open it, you get an "automatic header conversion
f
25 matches
Mail list logo
