Bug#401258: Reclose bug

2007-01-10 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Brian May wrote: > > "Peter" == Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Peter> Now hprop gets disabled again in upgrades from sarge to > Peter> etch, and when the package is removed - not purged - the > Peter> services still are enabled. > > Peter

Bug#401258: Reclose bug

2007-01-10 Thread Brian May
> "Peter" == Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> Now hprop gets disabled again in upgrades from sarge to Peter> etch, and when the package is removed - not purged - the Peter> services still are enabled. Peter> Both of these issues would have been fixed with my

Bug#401258: Reclose bug

2006-12-13 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Brian May wrote: > > "Peter" == Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Peter> Actually, this is really bad. > > Peter> It means the lines do _not_ get added on iditial > Peter> installations: > > Yes, as I worked out, too. > > Thanks for letting me

Bug#401258: Reclose bug

2006-12-12 Thread Brian May
> "Peter" == Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> Actually, this is really bad. Peter> It means the lines do _not_ get added on iditial Peter> installations: Yes, as I worked out, too. Thanks for letting me know; I have now replaced the -n with a -z in version -8.

Bug#401258: Reclose bug

2006-12-12 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > Peter is mistaken, add_servers is only called if "$2" is empty - i.e. on an > > initial installation. > | if [ -n "$2" ] > | then > | add_servers Actually, this is really bad. It means the lines do _not_ get added on idit

Bug#401258: Reclose bug

2006-12-12 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Brian May wrote: > I consider this cleaner then Peter's solution which always enables hprop on > upgrades even if you don't want it. It does not always enable hprop. It only enables it if was previously enabled. > It has always been my intention that hprop should be disable