On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:57:16PM -0500, Jeff Beaird wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:29:31PM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> >
> >>>I don't know if it makes a difference, but I'm quite sure I didn't have
> >>>this problem on another unstable machine. The machine whic
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:29:31PM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
I don't know if it makes a difference, but I'm quite sure I didn't have
this problem on another unstable machine. The machine which is having
the problem was recently installed from scratch; the other machi
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:29:31PM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> > I don't know if it makes a difference, but I'm quite sure I didn't have
> > this problem on another unstable machine. The machine which is having
> > the problem was recently installed from scratch; the other machine had
> >
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:08:27PM -0500, Jeff Beaird wrote:
> Mohammed Sameer wrote:
>
> >I had a look at the source code for gnome-terminal. gnome-terminal is
> >setting the
> >HOME environmental variable as well as some other variables. This explains
> >why it's
> >working fine with -display.
Mohammed Sameer wrote:
I had a look at the source code for gnome-terminal. gnome-terminal is setting
the
HOME environmental variable as well as some other variables. This explains why
it's
working fine with -display.
I'll work on a patch for that.
Thanks, Mohammed.
I don't know if it makes
owner 400923 !
thanks
> setting the HOME environmental variable a
Oops.
Meant DISPLAY
--
GNU/Linux registered user #224950
Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group Member.
Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org
--
Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
Read h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 400923 !
Bug#400923: gdm: $DISPLAY variable not set
Owner recorded as Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 09:07:29AM -0500, Jeff Beaird wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> >The point is that, according to the bug submitter, programs being run
> >*under* multi-gnome-terminal don't have $DISPLAY set in their environment.
> >
> >It may indeed still not be an m-g-t bug, but at least
Steve Langasek wrote:
The point is that, according to the bug submitter, programs being run
*under* multi-gnome-terminal don't have $DISPLAY set in their environment.
It may indeed still not be an m-g-t bug, but at least it doesn't appear to
be a gdm bug.
I, too, doubt that it's a multi-gnom
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:55:11PM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> I don't really get it. All X11 applications expect either $DISPLAY being set
> or
> -display being passed.
> How can gnome-terminal run when $DISPLAY is not set ?
> I don't think this is a multi-gnome-terminal bug.
The point is
Hi,
I don't really get it. All X11 applications expect either $DISPLAY being set or
-display being passed.
How can gnome-terminal run when $DISPLAY is not set ?
I don't think this is a multi-gnome-terminal bug.
--
GNU/Linux registered user #224950
Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group Member.
L
11 matches
Mail list logo
