Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported

2006-11-11 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 02:11:24PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:59:07PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > ... > > > Option 3) > > > * Set "Architecture: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel > > > powerpc sparc" > > > * Ask ftp-master for removal of pac

Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported

2006-11-11 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 15:04 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Architecture: !s390 > > No, this syntax is not supported. What is needed to finally support it? It's been wanted for years now and is clearly better than not having it. Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sign

Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported

2006-11-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 02:11:24PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > Option 4) > > > * Set "Architecture: any" > > > * Have fancy script to fail in s390. > > > * Ask ftp-master for removal of package for s390 > > > * Make entry in quinn-diff not to build on s390 > > This is an acceptable solution

Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported

2006-11-10 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:59:07PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: ... > > Option 3) > > * Set "Architecture: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel > > powerpc sparc" > > * Ask ftp-master for removal of package for s390 > > * Make entry in quinn-diff not to build on s390 > > This

Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported

2006-11-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 10:20:47AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > Anyone have suggestion? > > One possibility is to list the package as Architecture: any, but construct > > your debian/rules file such that the package fails to build if the > > architecture is s390. > That may be a good solution i

Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported

2006-11-10 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 03:04:54PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:17:57PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:00:32PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > Package: gsynaptics > > > Version: 0.9.7-1 > > > Severity: serious > > > > gsynaptics lists s3

Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported

2006-11-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:17:57PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:00:32PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Package: gsynaptics > > Version: 0.9.7-1 > > Severity: serious > > gsynaptics lists s390 as supported (Architecture: any) but > > xserver-xorg-input-synaptics is not ava

Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported

2006-11-10 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:17:57PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:00:32PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Package: gsynaptics > > Version: 0.9.7-1 > > Severity: serious > > > > gsynaptics lists s390 as supported (Architecture: any) but > > xserver-xorg-input-synaptics is not

Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported

2006-11-10 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:00:32PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: gsynaptics > Version: 0.9.7-1 > Severity: serious > > gsynaptics lists s390 as supported (Architecture: any) but > xserver-xorg-input-synaptics is not available. This leads to > uninstallable binary packages. I see. But xs

Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported

2006-11-10 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: gsynaptics Version: 0.9.7-1 Severity: serious gsynaptics lists s390 as supported (Architecture: any) but xserver-xorg-input-synaptics is not available. This leads to uninstallable binary packages. Bastian -- Landru! Guide us! -- A Beta 3-oid, "The Return of the Archons"