On 24/05/07 at 13:39 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 05:44:00PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Do you want me to orphan hsffig for you ?
>
> That would be good... have you found a way to build it from source in
> order to do that?
Nope, but we could just o
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 05:44:00PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Do you want me to orphan hsffig for you ?
That would be good... have you found a way to build it from source in
order to do that?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Lucas
>
> On 12/05/07 at 10:38 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > O
Hi John,
Do you want me to orphan hsffig for you ?
Thank you,
Lucas
On 12/05/07 at 10:38 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 10/05/07 at 15:29 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:06:18PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > BTW. I made little list of packages which FTBFS etc
On 10/05/07 at 15:29 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:06:18PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > BTW. I made little list of packages which FTBFS etc on
> > > http://wiki.debian.org/GhcTransition
> >
> > Any news on this ? This RC bug has been open for more than 200 days now,
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:06:18PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > BTW. I made little list of packages which FTBFS etc on
> > http://wiki.debian.org/GhcTransition
>
> Any news on this ? This RC bug has been open for more than 200 days now,
> and prevented hsffig from being included in etch.
I or
Hi Arjan & John,
On 20/10/06 at 17:30 +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> Op vr, 20-10-2006 te 08:02 -0500, schreef John Goerzen:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 12:37:49AM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> > > So either we use 1.0pl2 and fix it for compilation with GHC 6.6 or we
> > > need to package HXT and g
Op vr, 20-10-2006 te 08:02 -0500, schreef John Goerzen:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 12:37:49AM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> > So either we use 1.0pl2 and fix it for compilation with GHC 6.6 or we
> > need to package HXT and go with the 1.1 pre-release. Third option of
> > course is just to drop the
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 12:37:49AM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> So either we use 1.0pl2 and fix it for compilation with GHC 6.6 or we
> need to package HXT and go with the 1.1 pre-release. Third option of
> course is just to drop the package.
It would be nice to have HXT in Debian - I've been me
Op wo, 18-10-2006 te 16:10 -0400, schreef Dimitry Golubovsky:
> Arjan,
>
> On 10/18/06, Arjan Oosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John: were you going to package newer versions of HSFFIG? If yes
> please do (1.1 would be better anyway even though this is a
> pre-release, as it also contains FFI
[ please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the CC so
this information also reaches whoever fixes the bug ]
Hi,
Thanks for your input.
Op wo, 18-10-2006 te 18:46 +, schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Arjan,
>
> I am the developer of HSFFIG: here is a followup to what has come to my
> attention:
>
> Ar
Arjan,
On 10/18/06, Arjan Oosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well there really is a Debian package :) It is maintained by John
Goerzen and for the package details see
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=hsffig
I am really wondering
Package: hsffig
Version: 0.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi John,
hssfig FTBFS with the new ghc6 6.6:
ghc --make hsffig.hs -o hsffig -package text
ghc-6.6: unknown package: text
make[1]: *** [hsffig]
12 matches
Mail list logo