Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Please follow up this discussion in 399706. I agree Ruby is stupid
> here, but I don't intend to work around it.
I don't think so.
It is not a bug of Ruby and it is bug of apt-listbugs.
I think that the behaviour is intended by the upstream author of SOAP4r.
The current
Hi,
> But apt-listbugs now reclaims about http_proxy is set and aborts,
> which is not nice:
>
> # apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs
> /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:395:in `parse_options': E: sanity check failed:
> environment variable http_proxy is set and soap_use_proxy is not 'on'.
> (RuntimeError)
>
Hi Junichi,
version 0.0.63 does the job with the proxy for me. Good work!
But apt-listbugs now reclaims about http_proxy is set and aborts,
which is not nice:
# apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs
/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:395:in `parse_options': E: sanity check failed:
environment variable http_proxy
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 389681 0.0.59
Bug#389681: Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or
method `pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
Bug marked as found in version 0.0.59.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
found 389681 0.0.59
thanks
Hi,
>
> > Could you try to reproduce with
> >
> > /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs -d
>
>
> Same here, direct connection.
Thanks, there was a bug in initialization path that made SOAP
processing ignore apt.conf proxy configuration.
Should be fixed in
Hi
On Oct 06, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Could you try to reproduce with
>
> /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs -d
# /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs -d
http_proxy: http://http-proxy:8080/ : http-proxy 8080
http://bugs.debian.org:80/
indexdir = /indices/
Reading pac
Hi,
> > Have you read the manpage?
>
> No, at least not the one from the new version :).
> I just have done it ...
>
> > If you have configured proxy in your apt.conf, you don't need to think
> > about it, but If you are configuring your proxy with HTTP_PROXY
> > variable set, you need to set S
Hi
On Oct 06, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Have you read the manpage?
No, at least not the one from the new version :).
I just have done it ...
> If you have configured proxy in your apt.conf, you don't need to think
> about it, but If you are configuring your proxy with HTTP_PROXY
> variable set,
Hi,
> > .58 fixes the issue with http-proxy, please try.
>
> This is what I get with .58 installed:
>
> # apt-get upgrade
> [..]
> 35 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0B/46.0MB of archives.
> After unpacking 824kB of additional disk space will be used.
>
Hi
On Oct 04, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> .58 fixes the issue with http-proxy, please try.
This is what I get with .58 installed:
# apt-get upgrade
[..]
35 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/46.0MB of archives.
After unpacking 824kB of additional disk space
Hi,
> If the network connection does matter in any way: I have to use a
> http-proxy here, the network has no direct routing to the internet.
.58 fixes the issue with http-proxy, please try.
regasrds,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
If the network connection does matter in any way: I have to use a
http-proxy here, the network has no direct routing to the internet.
Regards,
Uwe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
On Oct 03, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Could you reproduce a full screen log for the apt session? Which
> package you tried to install, etc.
# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
freeguide (0.8.6-1 => 0.10.4
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.57
Followup-For: Bug #389681
Ditto here:
Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method
`pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
E: Unterprozess if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok
installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt ||
Hi,
> Package: apt-listbugs
> Version: 0.0.57
> Followup-For: Bug #389681
>
> This bug still exists in version 0.0.57:
>
> Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method
> `pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
> E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Stat
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.57
Followup-For: Bug #389681
This bug still exists in version 0.0.57:
Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method `pkg'
for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok installed';
16 matches
Mail list logo
