Hi,
Le 04/01/2012 07:20, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:56:48PM -0400, David Prévot a écrit :
>>
>> We could contact every current contributor, and ask them if they are OK to:
>> - grant copyright of their future contributions to SPI;
>> - grant copyright of their past contr
David Prévot
> If they refuse to grant copyright of their future contributions to SPI,
> or if they don't respond, the first action would be to remove their
> commit access, so starting at 2012, all the new content of the
> website will be copyright SPI.
That seems a bad situation in two ways: 1
David Prévot writes:
> I don't know what would be the best approach for future contributors
> (i.e. I don't know if we'll need to ask them explicitly for their
> consent, or if a page on our website would be enough), but for current
> and past contributors, we need their consent.
>
> We could cont
Le Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:56:48PM -0400, David Prévot a écrit :
>
> We could contact every current contributor, and ask them if they are OK to:
> - grant copyright of their future contributions to SPI;
> - grant copyright of their past contributions to SPI.
>
…
>
> Unless someone objects on th
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:56:48PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Once the copyright granted to SPI, it will be a lot easier to address
> the licensing issue, but I would prefer not to take care of everything
> at once (given past experience, trying to do everything at once is
> doomed to fail): this
Hi,
Since this year began with the website being free of the old charset
mess, I wonder if we could continue, and try to address as much as we
can of the copyright/license mess, starting with the copyright.
Talking on IRC with Rhonda and others, we came to the conclusion that
even if we'll have t
6 matches
Mail list logo
