Le Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 02:02:28AM +0200, Adeodato Simó :
> [snip]
Hi Adeodato,
I saw Julien Danjou today and after discussing with him, I find that
my mail was not well-written. In fact, as I said, I have many projects
and don't have enough time to make a good packaging-work for amule.
Actu
* Julien Delange [Sat, 03 Jun 2006 18:33:07 +0200]:
> I don't want you teach me anithing. I juste want somebody who can help
> me when I have no time to maintain it and resolve bugs :-) So, if you
> can, great !
Okay. Then I'll take care of amule maintenance starting today, and we'll
get back to
Le Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:34:58PM +0200, Adeodato Simó :
> Okay, I'll do, thanks. However, I'm sorry that you don't have the time,
> since my objective was only to have amule in good shape, and I wouldn't
> have minded (or would have preferred, even) to act as a tutor/sponsor
> and walk you throug
* Julien Delange [Sat, 03 Jun 2006 12:03:01 +0200]:
Hi,
> Le Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 10:30:10PM +0200, Adeodato Simó :
> > Okay. Let me know what your thoughts about this are: if you just want
> > quick NMUs from time to time, or co-maintainer uploads, or your lack of
> > time may be a serious issue
Le Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 10:30:10PM +0200, Adeodato Simó :
> Okay. Let me know what your thoughts about this are: if you just want
> quick NMUs from time to time, or co-maintainer uploads, or your lack of
> time may be a serious issue for amule maintenance and you think more
> people becoming really
* Julien Delange [Fri, 02 Jun 2006 20:50:25 +0200]:
> Yes, I understand, but you know, I not enough time to make a good
> package, so I made dirty ones, and obviously, it's not a good way.
Indeed, uploading dirty packages to the archive is bad for everybody. :(
> > And to both of you, apologies
Le Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 07:52:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó :
> On second thoughts, I won't fix this myself, since I prefer to make sure
> that Julien understands what was wrong, why the builds failed, and how
> does one fix it, and me rushing in an upload just to save a bit of buildd
> time won't help
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 07:52:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> And to both of you, apologies if I'm a bit pushy at times, it's only
> that I like things well done. Also, I'll be happy if you want to sponsor
> the next upload if Julien Danjou is short of time, and go with soda
> through fixing th
* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 02 Jun 2006 19:23:58 +0200]:
> Since I just NMUed, and failed to spot this bug (since my upload included
> binary-all, and did not trigger the bug), I'll make a second upload
> right away.
> Apologies for not spotting this,
On second thoughts, I won't fix this myself, since
Package: amule
Version: 2.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
the latest upload of amule failed to build on every buildd, due to a
bogus debian/rules file:
dpkg-genchanges -B
dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent
packages
dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read f
10 matches
Mail list logo
